It’s a bold and a bit cheeky statement.
It sounds impossible.
Naive, even.
But let’s ask the question anyway:
Why are most wars actually fought?
Not the official reasons.
Not the speeches.
Not the flags.
Underneath all of that…
Wars are fought over land, resources, and control.
And very often, they are fueled by something even more fragile: The human ego. Hubris.
Not just strategy. Not just “necessity”.
But pride, fear, and the need to dominate or not appear weak.
What we call geopolitics is, at times, simply human psychology scaled up to the level of nations.
The Real Battlefield
Nations don’t go to war because ordinary people suddenly decide they hate each other.
They go to war because:
- Land is claimed as owned
- Resources are treated as limited and competed for
- Power is concentrated in the hands of a few
And those few decision-makers are human.
With pride.
With fear.
With something to prove.
Call it strategy if you want.
But often, it is simply hubris with consequences.
The Illusion of Scarcity
There was a time when scarcity was real.
Centuries ago, survival depended on access to land, water, and basic resources that were genuinely limited in many places. Communities had to defend what they had, because losing it could mean not surviving at all.
In that world, conflict—however tragic—made a certain kind of sense.
But we are no longer living in that world.
Today, we live on a planet that is overwhelmingly abundant. In spite of us being many more, we actually have more than enough, although many go without. Because of the system.
We already produce more than enough food to feed everyone.
We already have the knowledge to house everyone.
We already have the technology to solve most of our major challenges.
And yet, we behave as if there is not enough.
We are still playing by the same rules…
But the conditions have changed.
What was once a response to real scarcity has become a system built on perceived scarcity.
Why?
Because access is not based on what exists.
It is based on ownership and control.
And once something is owned, it must be defended.
And when it is threatened…
Conflict becomes inevitable.
What If Nothing Is Owned?
This is where the question becomes interesting.
If land is no longer something you can own…
If resources are no longer something you need to hoard…
If survival is no longer tied to control…
Then what exactly is left to go to war about?
Not much.
Disagreements would still exist.
But disagreement is not war.
War requires something more:
The belief that you must take, defend, and dominate to survive.
Remove that belief—and the structures that reinforce it—and war begins to lose its foundation.
From Ownership to Stewardship
A resource-based economy is, at its core, a shift from ownership to stewardship.
It means we stop asking:
“Who owns this?”
And start asking:
“How do we take care of this—and make it work for everyone?”
Ownership is a rule we invented.
Stewardship is a relationship.
Ownership says:
This is mine. I control it. I can exclude others.
Stewardship says:
This is part of our shared world. I take care of it, and others benefit from it too.
What Happens to Nations?
If ownership of land ends, something profound follows.
The idea of nations—as political and economic borders—begins to dissolve.
Not cultures.
Not languages.
Not identities.
Those remain. They flourish.
What disappears are the lines that divide access.
- No one is “foreign” to the Earth
- Movement is not restricted by passports or permission
- Travel becomes a natural part of being human
And resources?
They are no longer trapped behind borders.
They flow to where they are needed most.
Because the question is no longer:
“What belongs to us?”
But:
“What is needed where—and how do we provide it?”
What It Looks Like in Practice
This is not about control.
And it is not about restriction.
It is about organizing what we already have so that it works for everyone.
In such a world:
- Food is produced and distributed because people need to eat—not because it must be sold
- Homes exist to be lived in—not as financial assets
- Energy flows where it is needed—not where it generates the highest profit
- Transportation exists to move goods and people—not to extract value from them
And most importantly:
No one has to earn the right to live.
The Role of Leadership
Most people do not want war.
They want stability.
Safety.
A decent life.
Wars are rarely the will of the many.
They are decisions made by the few.
So maybe the real question is not:
Why do we fight?
But:
Why do we allow a system that divides people and creates devastating conflict? And that allows a very few people to make decisions affecting billions?
The Shift
Ending war is not about becoming morally perfect.
It is about changing the conditions that make war make sense in the first place.
A world where:
- Resources are properly managed, not owned and exploited
- Access is guaranteed, not competed for
- Survival is secured, not negotiated
- Decisions are transparent and shared
In such a world, war does not need to be forbidden.
It simply becomes…
obsolete.
Imagine This Instead
Imagine waking up in a world where no one can profit from conflict.
Where land is not a prize, but a shared responsibility.
Where leadership is not about power, but coordination.
Where the question is no longer:
“Who gets what?”
But:
“How do we make this world work for everyone?”
Call to Action
If this sounds unrealistic, that is okay.
Every system we live in today was once just an “unrealistic” idea.
The real question is:
Can we imagine something better clearly enough to begin building it?
That is exactly why the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity was created.
Not to argue.
But to show what such a world could actually feel like to live in.
Follow Benjamin Michaels as he wakes up in a future where humanity has moved beyond war, beyond ownership and money, and beyond the need to compete for survival.
And if this perspective resonates with you…
please share this article. I Thank you.
Because new worlds do not begin with systems.
They begin with a vision people can feel is possible.
Leave a Reply