Category: Blog

Most politicians do not enter politics wanting to make society worse.

Many genuinely want cleaner cities, safer communities, better healthcare, lower inequality, a stronger economy, and a more sustainable future.

Then they all collide with the same invisible wall:

The monetary system itself.

The Invisible Wall

Because regardless of ideology, party, or intentions, they hit the same wall:

• Economic growth must continue.
• Jobs must be protected.
• Banks must remain stable.
• Debt and money must keep circulating.
• Consumption must continue.
• Housing prices cannot collapse.
• Markets must stay “confident.”
• Energy must stay cheap enough.
• Inflation must not explode.
• But also not too much deflation.
• Climate goals must somehow happen simultaneously.

And every politician entering the system discovers the same thing:

The monetary system itself constantly pulls decisions back toward short-term economic survival rather than long-term human and planetary well-being.

And suddenly long-term human and planetary well-being must compete with the immediate survival demands of the economic machine.

That is the real pain in the ass of politicians.

Not necessarily opposing parties.
Not always the voters.
Not even corruption in itself.

But the constant pressure from a system that requires continuous economic motion simply to avoid collapse.

A System Built on Endless Growth

Because the modern monetary system is not built around balance. It is built around growth.

Everything must keep growing. Money must grow. Debt must expand. Consumption must continue. Growth must persist.

And if that motion slows too much, fear immediately appears:

Recession. Unemployment. Banking instability. Stock market panic. Political unrest. Falling tax revenues. Debt problems. When we started out with this system it seemed everything could go on forever. Unfortunately it can’t. Now we are seeing the limits.

The Environmental Trap

Even politicians who sincerely want environmental reform often find themselves trapped.

Because most environmental solutions reduce consumption. They reduce extraction. They reduce unnecessary production. They reduce energy demand. They reduce waste. They reduce planned obsolescence.

But reducing these things inside a growth-based monetary system can simultaneously threaten jobs, profits, pension funds, tax income, and financial stability.

And suddenly politicians face an impossible balancing act.

Save the environment too aggressively?
Risk economic instability.

Stimulate the economy too aggressively?
Accelerate ecological destruction.

Protect jobs?
Increase emissions.

Reduce emissions?
Threaten industries and employment.

The system constantly pulls politics back toward short-term economic survival.

Why Politics Feels Contradictory

This is why governments often appear contradictory.

One day they speak about climate emergency.
The next day they approve new oil projects.

One day they speak about sustainability.
The next day they stimulate mass consumption to “boost the economy.”

One day they promise environmental responsibility.
The next day they panic because inflation rises, housing slows down, or investors become nervous.

The Green New Dealemma

This is also why some politicians advocate ideas like a “Green New Deal.”

The hope is understandable.

If environmental transformation could also stimulate economic growth, create jobs, generate investment, modernize infrastructure, and keep money circulating, then perhaps the system could save both the economy and the environment simultaneously.

And to some degree, such policies may indeed slow damage and create positive change.

But even these proposals collide with the same structural limitations.

Because large-scale green transitions still require enormous industrial production, mining, energy infrastructure, debt financing, political consensus, global coordination, stable supply chains, and continued economic growth.

Entire industries would need to transform simultaneously while millions of people still depend on the old system for jobs, pensions, mortgages, investments, and daily survival.

And this is precisely the trap.

Critics and energy analysts argue that proposals like the Green New Deal may ultimately fail because of prohibitive costs, logistical unfeasibility, dependence on infrastructure that does not yet exist at the required scale, and enormous political resistance.

Others fear that such transitions would require massive expansions of government control, regulation, and centralized coordination, creating new tensions around freedom, bureaucracy, taxation, and power.

And yet, without large-scale transformation, environmental problems continue accelerating.

So politics becomes trapped between two impossible pressures:

Change too little, and the ecological crisis deepens.

Change too aggressively, and the economic and political system itself begins to destabilize.

Even many of the proposed solutions to the crisis still depend on maintaining the very monetary growth dynamics that helped create the crisis in the first place.

Because beneath almost every political promise sits the same hidden requirement:

Keep the economic engine alive.

Even when the engine itself may be causing many of the problems.

The Deeper Structural Problem

And this is where the conversation becomes uncomfortable.

Because perhaps the issue is not simply bad politicians and bad decisions. Perhaps the issue is that politics itself has become trapped inside a monetary operating system that humanity no longer fully controls.

A system where survival increasingly depends on maintaining the very dynamics creating instability, threatening both our climate, nature, human wellbeing and the planet itself.

Infinite growth on a finite planet. Permanent overconsumption. Debt-based expansion. Competition between nations. Competition between corporations. Competition between individuals. All accelerating simultaneously.

Political Paralysis

Another symptom of this systemic pressure is how increasingly difficult it seems for many countries to even form stable governments.

Elections happen.
Coalitions are negotiated.
Parties argue endlessly.
Weeks or months pass.
And still they often struggle to collaborate.

Because even when politicians agree that problems exist, they fundamentally disagree about how to handle the economic machine underneath society.

Raise taxes? Lower taxes? Stimulate growth? Reduce spending? Expand welfare? Cut welfare? Regulate markets? Deregulate markets? Increase energy production? Reduce consumption? Save the environment?

And all of it happens under enormous pressure from debt, markets, industry, employment, media, lobby groups, and voter anxiety.

Politics increasingly becomes less about solving problems and more about managing instability inside the inherently unstable monetary system itself.

The Mechanics

Politicians are then forced to operate almost like mechanics trying to repair a broken engine while driving at full speed down the highway.

They cannot simply stop. Because millions of livelihoods depend on the machine continuing to run. But even though the right tools are at hand they cannot be used.

The Absurdity

In fact, the more technologically advanced humanity becomes, the more absurd the situation starts to look. We have the tools but don’t use them fully.

We now possess extraordinary technology. Automation. AI. Global logistics. Scientific knowledge. Robotics. Advanced agriculture. Communication systems.

Humanity has never had more capacity to coordinate resources intelligently.

Yet societies still operate as if artificial scarcity, endless competition, and permanent economic anxiety are unavoidable laws of nature.

A System Humanity No Longer Understands

Perhaps they are not laws of nature.

Perhaps they are features of the current system itself.

And perhaps this is why more people across the world increasingly feel that something fundamental no longer makes sense.

Because despite incredible technological advancement, stress, burnout, inequality, debt pressure, ecological instability continue growing.

The machine becomes more advanced. But the human being inside the machine often feels less free.

Maybe humanity is beginning to realize that the real challenge is no longer technological.

Maybe it is systemic.

Beyond Politics

In the future world of Waking Up, this constant political paralysis no longer dominates civilization.

Not because humanity suddenly agrees on everything.
But because the old monetary pressure system is gone.

Instead of political parties endlessly competing for power while trying to keep economic growth alive, decisions are increasingly based on science, sustainability, systems analysis, ecological balance, human well-being, and what actually works for humanity and the planet long term.

The goal is no longer ideological victory.
The goal becomes intelligent stewardship.

A Peek Into The Future

In the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity, the former billionaire Benjamin Michaels wakes up 100 years into the future after cryonic preservation.

What shocks him most is not the technology.

It is that humanity has moved beyond the monetary operating system itself.

The future world is no longer organized around profit, debt, ownership accumulation, or endless competition.

Instead, resources are coordinated intelligently around human and planetary well-being by using the technology that is already available today, but of course have been refined in this future.

Not because humanity became perfect. But because civilization eventually realized that the old system itself had become the constant pain in the ass of politics, sustainability, and human progress. If you would like a peek into this future you can 

👉 Discover the story here.

And if this article resonated with you I invite you to share it. If enough people become aware of this possibility our children might even thrive in that future…