In the beginning, no one owned the world.
Land was used, not possessed.
Resources were shared, not abstracted.
Access to life was governed by custom, ecology, and relationship — not by permission or price.
Then something subtle — and decisive — happened.
Some people began to claim that the universe itself had an order. A cosmic structure governing seasons, fertility, success, failure, harmony, and chaos. And more importantly, they claimed the authority to interpret that order.
This is where the modern monetary system truly begins.
⸻
Claiming the order of everything
This shift is first clearly documented in ancient Mesopotamia, particularly in Sumer — the earliest known complex civilization.
Once cosmic order was named, it could be administered.
Those who claimed to understand it — priests, kings, early administrators — did not initially present themselves as rulers or owners. They presented themselves as intermediaries between humanity and reality itself.
The land, they said, belonged to the gods.
Water followed divine logic.
Time was sacred.
Humans were allowed to participate — conditionally.
This was the crucial shift: access to life became something that could be granted, measured, and withdrawn.
⸻
From shared to administered access
With cosmic order in place, coordination followed.
Land was allocated.
Water was regulated.
Harvests were stored.
Labor was scheduled.
Nothing was yet called “ownership.” But everything became administered.
And administration requires records.
Clay tablets tracked grain, silver, livestock, and labor — not to facilitate exchange between equals, but to record who had received what, and therefore what was owed.
Most money never circulated.
It existed as numbers.
Debt came before cash.
⸻
When obligation became moral reality
Because obligation was framed as part of cosmic order, repayment was not optional.
Failing to repay was not merely an economic problem. It was moral disorder. It meant being out of alignment with reality itself.
This is how control became internal.
People did not comply primarily because of force.
They complied because the system defined what was right, normal, and real.
⸻
When stewardship hardened into control
At first, the system provided genuine coordination.
Surpluses were managed.
Risk was shared.
Infrastructure was maintained.
But the structure contained a quiet escalation.
When obligations could accumulate.
When repayment was enforced regardless of harvest or circumstance.
When access had no guaranteed exit.
Stewardship hardened into control.
Administration became authority.
Authority became permanent.
And permanence quietly became ownership.
⸻
From cosmic order to unquestionable system
Over time, the gods faded.
Temples lost authority.
Kings fell.
But the structure survived.
Cosmic order did not disappear — it secularized.
Today, the authority once claimed by gods is carried by abstractions:
• “The economy”
• “The market”
• “Growth”
• “Creditworthiness”
• “Fiscal responsibility”
These are treated not as tools, but as forces of nature.
This is why the monetary system feels all-encompassing. It’s not only a system governing money.
It governs food, housing, healthcare, education, mobility, time, and even self‑worth.
It is not merely pervasive.
It is assumed.
And what is assumed is rarely questioned.
⸻
Why almost no one questions it
When a system presents itself as reality itself, critique sounds irrational.
Questioning money does not invite discussion.
It triggers reflexive responses:
• “Unrealistic.”
• “Naïve.”
• “Utopian.”
These are not arguments.
They are symptoms of a system that inherited cosmic authority.
Money no longer needs priests.
It has internalized obedience.
⸻
One system everywhere — and nowhere accountable
Because the monetary system is treated as neutral and inevitable, it is allowed to shape almost every aspect of modern life without ever being held responsible for its consequences.
Today, money quietly governs:
• what food is grown and what is destroyed
• where people may live, and where they may not
• which lives are supported and which are deemed “unviable”
• how long products last, and how quickly they must be replaced
• whether ecosystems are protected or sacrificed
The system does not ask whether something is needed, healthy, or sustainable.
It asks whether it is profitable.
⸻
The planetary cost of an unquestionable system
When profit becomes the primary goal, destruction becomes rational.
Forests are cleared because growth demands expansion.
Oceans are depleted because regeneration does not fit quarterly reports.
Soil is exhausted because long-term balance does not register as value.
Climate breakdown, mass extinction, and ecological collapse are not failures of humanity.
They are logical outcomes of a system that converts life into numbers and treats limits as obstacles.
⸻
The human cost
The same logic applies to people.
When access to life is mediated by money:
• stress becomes structural
• insecurity becomes normal
• competition replaces cooperation
• worth is confused with income
Entire populations live in permanent precarity — not because resources are scarce, but because access is conditional.
The system extracts not only labor, but attention, time, health, meaning and value.
⸻
Nature as collateral damage
In a monetary system, nature does not exist.
Only exploitable resources do.
Rivers become assets.
Forests become commodities.
Animals become units.
What cannot be priced is ignored.
What cannot be owned is vulnerable.
This is not accidental.
It is the consequence of placing an abstract accounting system above the living world.
⸻
Seeing the continuity
This is the long arc:
Cosmic order → administered access → obligation → ownership → abstraction → unquestionable system.
Different eras.
Different language.
Same structure.
Money did not become powerful because it worked better than alternatives.
It became powerful because it absorbed the authority to define reality.
⸻
Returning — without going backward
A moneyless world is often imagined as regression.
It is the opposite.
It is a return to shared access — without myth.
Where early societies relied on belief and authority to coordinate resources, a mature civilization can rely on:
• real‑time data
• transparent logistics
• ecological limits
• distributed decision‑making
• advanced production technologies
In other words:
What once required cosmic authority can now be handled by information and coordination.
⸻
Back to our roots — forward in capability
Removing money is not about removing structure.
It is about removing sacred abstraction.
Provision instead of obligation.
Access instead of permission.
Coordination instead of control.
Not a new cosmic order.
No unquestionable system at all.
Just humans — consciously organizing reality with tools powerful enough to finally make myth unnecessary.
⸻
If this resonates, please share this article.
And if you want to explore this transition through story rather than theory, the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity imagines a world that has already taken this step.
Sometimes the most radical act is not rebellion —
but remembering that we are allowed to redesign what humans once invented.
Leave a Reply