Category: PARADIGM

  • The Emerging World

    The Emerging World

    Long before a new world appears in reality, it first appears in the imagination. In the minds of people.

    Every great transformation in human history began this way.

    Someone imagined a possibility that did not yet exist.

    A different society.

    A different relationship with nature.

    A different way of living together.

    Today, millions of people are beginning to imagine such a possibility once again.

    Not because they have all agreed on a political ideology.

    Not because a government told them to.

    But because they can sense that humanity is capable of something better. A world that works for all.

    That is why a new world is emerging.

    But how does real change really happen?

    Outside-In or Inside-Out?

    Most of us have been taught to think that change happens from the outside in.

    We elect new politicians.

    We pass new laws.

    We create new institutions.

    We reform old systems.

    The assumption is that if we change the structures around us, people will change as a result.

    And there is truth in that. The system we live within definitely shapes our behavior. The incentives, rewards, pressures, and expectations around us influence how we think and act every day.

    But the change that is now emerging must first begin within the hearts and minds of people.

    Why?

    Because this is not a change that can be forced from the outside.

    That would contradict the very purpose of creating a world that truly works for everyone.

    A peaceful world cannot be coerced. A mature world cannot be imposed. A world based on cooperation cannot be forced through coercion.

    A world that works for all requires that we solve our differences through clear, open, honest, and mature communication. Not like children fighting over toys and being told by their mother to stop fighting.

    The next step in human history must come from within.

    It must come because we have matured enough to see that there is a better way.

    Just as the system of today often reinforces competition, greed, envy, fear, and egotistical behavior, the system of tomorrow—created from an awakened understanding—will reinforce natural sharing, caring, stewardship, communication, and cooperation.

    The systems we create reflect the consciousness from which they emerge.

    That is why the emerging world must begin within us before it can appear around us.

    Seeing the Future

    Before any great change becomes reality, it first appears as a vision.

    Before the abolition of slavery, someone had to imagine a world without it.

    Before women gained the right to vote, someone had to imagine a world where they could.

    Before environmental protection became mainstream, someone had to imagine that humanity could live in harmony with nature.

    Every civilization begins as an idea.

    Every city begins as an idea.

    Every invention begins as an idea.

    And every new world begins as an idea.

    The question is not whether we can build a different future.

    The question is whether we can first imagine one.

    And perhaps that is exactly what is happening today.

    More and more people are beginning to see a possibility beyond the world we inherited.

    A world where humanity lives in peace with itself.

    A world with clean air, clean water, healthy food, restored ecosystems, and technologies designed to support life rather than exploit it.

    A world where abundance is shared rather than withheld.

    A world that works for everyone.

    Once seen, it becomes difficult to unsee.

    Beyond Politics

    This is where I part ways with much of traditional politics.

    Politics generally seeks to change society from the outside in.

    Change the government.

    Change the laws.

    Change the economy.

    Change the people.

    But a truly new world cannot be imposed into existence.

    It cannot be legislated into existence.

    It cannot be forced into existence.

    A world based on cooperation, stewardship, peace, and abundance can only emerge when enough people genuinely want such a world.

    That change begins within human beings.

    Not within institutions.

    Not within governments.

    Within us.

    The emerging world is therefore not political in the traditional sense.

    It is cultural.

    It is psychological.

    It is a shift in consciousness.

    Traditional politics often asks:

    “How do we change the world?”

    The emerging world asks:

    “How do we change ourselves so that a different world becomes possible?”

    Signs of the Emerging World

    Many people imagine that a moneyless world must begin with the collapse of the current system.

    I am not convinced.

    What if the new world is already emerging within the old one?

    Look around.

    People share knowledge freely through open-source software.

    People contribute to Wikipedia without expecting payment.

    Communities create gardens, repair cafés, and tool libraries.

    Millions of people volunteer their time to causes they believe in.

    Gift economy groups exist all over the world, sharing freely things they have in excess.

    I know this because I started one myself more than a decade ago:

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/GiftEconomy

    Thousands of people have joined it over the years. Every day, useful resources flow from people who no longer need them to people who do.

    No prices.

    No profit.

    No transactions.

    Just people helping people.

    These initiatives are not the final destination.

    But they may be signs of where humanity is heading.

    They are small glimpses of a different logic.

    Not ownership.

    Not accumulation.

    Not competition.

    But sharing, stewardship, and cooperation.

    Building Tomorrow from Today

    This does not mean we must wait for the current system to collapse before we can begin.

    In fact, the opposite may be true.

    Many of these initiatives already exist without funding, marketing, political power, or institutional support.

    They emerged because people saw a better way.

    Imagine what could happen if some of them received support.

    Not because money is the foundation of the new world.

    It is not.

    The foundation is people, understanding, cooperation, and shared purpose.

    But resources can help ideas spread.

    Resources can help successful experiments grow.

    Resources can help communities connect and learn from one another.

    In this way, the current system may unintentionally help create its own successor.

    Not through revolution.

    Not through conquest.

    But through the gradual emergence of something better.

    A better world does not need to defeat the old one.

    It simply needs to demonstrate that it works.

    The Seed of a New Civilization

    People often ask how a moneyless world could ever be created.

    Perhaps they are looking at the tree and forgetting the seed.

    A seed does not look like a tree. Quite the contrary, it looks small and insignificant.

    Yet everything the tree will become is already present within it.

    The same may be true of the future.

    Before there can be new communities, there must be a new understanding.

    Before there can be Cities of Light, there must be people capable of imagining them.

    Before there can be a new civilization, there must be a vision of one.

    That is why books, conversations, ideas, and inspiration matter.

    They plant seeds.

    The physical structures come later.

    The real transition begins in the minds and hearts of people.

    Why I Wrote Waking Up

    This is the reason I wrote Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity.

    Not to present a political program.

    Not to tell people what to think.

    But to offer a vision.

    To ask a simple question:

    What might humanity look like if we actually succeeded?

    Not if one nation conquered another.

    Not if one political party defeated another.

    Not if one class triumphed over another.

    But if humanity itself matured.

    If we learned to live together.

    If we learned to care for each other and for the planet that sustains us.

    The purpose of the story is not to predict the future.

    It is just to help us imagine one.

    Because before we can build a better world, we must first be able to see it.

    When the Future Begins

    The emerging world will arrive because a growing number of people begin to see a different possibility.

    They begin to understand that humanity shares one planet.

    They begin to understand that our futures are interconnected.

    They begin to understand that cooperation can achieve what competition never could.

    From that understanding come new behaviors.

    From new behaviors come new communities.

    From new communities come new structures.

    And from those structures emerges a new civilization.

    The transition does not begin in parliament.

    It does not begin in a City of Light.

    It does not begin in any physical structure at all.

    It begins in the minds and hearts of people.

    That is where every new world has always begun.

    And perhaps that is why the emerging world is already here.

    A sprout not fully formed.

    Not yet visible everywhere.

    But emerging quietly within millions of people who have seen the possibility of something better and have begun moving toward it together.

    Please share this article if it resonates.Because that is how the emerging world spreads.

    👉 Discover the story here.

  • Beyond Class War: Why a Livable Future Must Include Everyone

    Beyond Class War: Why a Livable Future Must Include Everyone

    Many visions of social change are built on a familiar story: the poor rise up against the rich, the powerful are overthrown, and a new reality is born from struggle.

    This narrative has deep historical roots. Revolutions, political movements, and countless novels have told the story of history as a conflict between classes.

    But if humanity truly wants to build a peaceful and livable future, we may need to question whether a transition based on class war can ever lead to lasting harmony.

    A Critique Worth Considering

    A recent one‑star review of Waking Up criticized the novel for not following the traditional class‑struggle narrative found in many utopian or socialist novels. The reviewer argued that in most classic works about moneyless societies, change comes from ordinary people struggling against the wealthy. In his words, it is “working people struggling to survive” who should create the transformation, not “the super‑rich who get together to decide to abolish money and property.” He also pointed to other well‑known works in the genre such as Looking Backward, News From Nowhere, and The Dispossessed, suggesting that these stories portray social transformation more realistically.

    This critique is interesting, because it highlights a fundamental assumption that many people bring to discussions about systemic change: that any transition to a better world must be driven by conflict between social classes.

    But is class war really the best path to a better future?

    A Clarification

    It is also worth clarifying a point that the reviewer appears to have misunderstood. In Waking Up, the new world is not created simply because a group of wealthy people decide to abolish money. The character Amo — the daughter of Benjamin Michaels — initiated the first experiments by using the resources available to her to begin creating moneyless communities, the early Cities of Light, within the existing system. These early initiatives acted as prototypes. As the model proved workable, the idea spread and people across the world participated in building and expanding the new system. In other words, the transition was not an elite decision, but a collective evolution that gradually included people from all parts of society.

    The Problem With Class-Based Transitions

    Class conflict may explain parts of history, but building a future on resentment and victory over others creates a dangerous foundation.

    If one group defeats another, the underlying psychology of power and domination often remains. The roles simply reverse. Yesterday’s oppressed can become tomorrow’s oppressors.

    Us Versus Them

    A truly stable and cooperative world cannot emerge from a mentality of “us versus them.” It must move beyond the idea that society is fundamentally divided into enemies.

    Systems, Not People

    Many of the problems humanity faces today are not caused by individual moral failures. They are consequences of the systems we operate within.

    Our economic structures reward competition, accumulation, and short-term gain. People within those systems often behave according to the incentives placed in front of them.

    This means the challenge is not to defeat a particular class of people, but to rethink the systems that shape behavior. History shows that many revolutions replace the people in power while leaving the underlying system of money and ownership largely intact, allowing the same structural problems to reappear with different players.

    But if the rules of the game, and thus the system itself change, human behavior often changes with them.

    An Inclusive Transition

    A future that truly works for everyone cannot exclude large parts of humanity from the process of building it.

    Scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, workers, artists, teachers, and even those who currently benefit from existing systems all possess knowledge, skills, and resources that will be needed to design a better world.

    Instead of framing the transition as a struggle between rich and poor, it may be more productive to see it as a collective realization that the current system no longer serves humanity or the planet.

    When that realization spreads, people from all walks of life can begin contributing to the redesign.

    From Conflict to Cooperation

    History shows that cooperation is one of humanity’s greatest strengths. Entire civilizations have been built through collaboration across cultures, professions, and social groups.

    The challenge of the 21st century may not be to win a class war, but to learn how to coordinate our collective intelligence for the benefit of all.

    The technologies we have today — automation, artificial intelligence, global communication — make it increasingly possible to organize society in ways that were unimaginable in the past.

    But technology alone is not enough. Technology is merely a tool; without the cultural and philosophical mindset to use it wisely, it cannot create a better world.

    A Future Built Together

    If humanity is to create a truly livable future, it may need to move beyond narratives of victory and defeat.

    The real challenge is not to defeat one another, but to redesign the systems that govern our lives.

    That work will require the participation of all of us.

    And perhaps the most hopeful possibility is that the future will not be built by one class triumphing over another — but by humanity discovering that it is, in the end, one family sharing the same planet.

    If this perspective resonates with you, please share this article.

    A world beyond money, conflict, and artificial scarcity is explored through story in the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity.

    Feel free to check it out.

  • The Unquestionable System

    The Unquestionable System

    In the beginning, no one owned the world.

    Land was used, not possessed.

    Resources were shared, not abstracted.

    Access to life was governed by custom, ecology, and relationship — not by permission or price.

    Then something subtle — and decisive — happened.

    Some people began to claim that the universe itself had an order. A cosmic structure governing seasons, fertility, success, failure, harmony, and chaos. And more importantly, they claimed the authority to interpret that order.

    This is where the modern monetary system truly begins.

    ⸻

    Claiming the order of everything

    This shift is first clearly documented in ancient Mesopotamia, particularly in Sumer — the earliest known complex civilization.

    Once cosmic order was named, it could be administered.

    Those who claimed to understand it — priests, kings, early administrators — did not initially present themselves as rulers or owners. They presented themselves as intermediaries between humanity and reality itself.

    The land, they said, belonged to the gods.

    Water followed divine logic.

    Time was sacred.

    Humans were allowed to participate — conditionally.

    This was the crucial shift: access to life became something that could be granted, measured, and withdrawn.

    ⸻

    From shared to administered access

    With cosmic order in place, coordination followed.

    Land was allocated.

    Water was regulated.

    Harvests were stored.

    Labor was scheduled.

    Nothing was yet called “ownership.” But everything became administered.

    And administration requires records.

    Clay tablets tracked grain, silver, livestock, and labor — not to facilitate exchange between equals, but to record who had received what, and therefore what was owed.

    Most money never circulated.

    It existed as numbers.

    Debt came before cash.

    ⸻

    When obligation became moral reality

    Because obligation was framed as part of cosmic order, repayment was not optional.

    Failing to repay was not merely an economic problem. It was moral disorder. It meant being out of alignment with reality itself.

    This is how control became internal.

    People did not comply primarily because of force.

    They complied because the system defined what was right, normal, and real.

    ⸻

    When stewardship hardened into control

    At first, the system provided genuine coordination.

    Surpluses were managed.

    Risk was shared.

    Infrastructure was maintained.

    But the structure contained a quiet escalation.

    When obligations could accumulate.

    When repayment was enforced regardless of harvest or circumstance.

    When access had no guaranteed exit.

    Stewardship hardened into control.

    Administration became authority.

    Authority became permanent.

    And permanence quietly became ownership.

    ⸻

    From cosmic order to unquestionable system

    Over time, the gods faded.

    Temples lost authority.

    Kings fell.

    But the structure survived.

    Cosmic order did not disappear — it secularized.

    Today, the authority once claimed by gods is carried by abstractions:

    • “The economy”

    • “The market”

    • “Growth”

    • “Creditworthiness”

    • “Fiscal responsibility”

    These are treated not as tools, but as forces of nature.

    This is why the monetary system feels all-encompassing. It’s not only a system governing money. 

    It governs food, housing, healthcare, education, mobility, time, and even self‑worth.

    It is not merely pervasive.

    It is assumed.

    And what is assumed is rarely questioned.

    ⸻

    Why almost no one questions it

    When a system presents itself as reality itself, critique sounds irrational.

    Questioning money does not invite discussion.

    It triggers reflexive responses:

    • “Unrealistic.”

    • “Naïve.”

    • “Utopian.”

    These are not arguments.

    They are symptoms of a system that inherited cosmic authority.

    Money no longer needs priests.

    It has internalized obedience.

    ⸻

    One system everywhere — and nowhere accountable

    Because the monetary system is treated as neutral and inevitable, it is allowed to shape almost every aspect of modern life without ever being held responsible for its consequences.

    Today, money quietly governs:

    • what food is grown and what is destroyed

    • where people may live, and where they may not

    • which lives are supported and which are deemed “unviable”

    • how long products last, and how quickly they must be replaced

    • whether ecosystems are protected or sacrificed

    The system does not ask whether something is needed, healthy, or sustainable.

    It asks whether it is profitable.

    ⸻

    The planetary cost of an unquestionable system

    When profit becomes the primary goal, destruction becomes rational.

    Forests are cleared because growth demands expansion.

    Oceans are depleted because regeneration does not fit quarterly reports.

    Soil is exhausted because long-term balance does not register as value.

    Climate breakdown, mass extinction, and ecological collapse are not failures of humanity.

    They are logical outcomes of a system that converts life into numbers and treats limits as obstacles.

    ⸻

    The human cost

    The same logic applies to people.

    When access to life is mediated by money:

    • stress becomes structural

    • insecurity becomes normal

    • competition replaces cooperation

    • worth is confused with income

    Entire populations live in permanent precarity — not because resources are scarce, but because access is conditional.

    The system extracts not only labor, but attention, time, health,  meaning and value.

    ⸻

    Nature as collateral damage

    In a monetary system, nature does not exist.

    Only exploitable resources do.

    Rivers become assets.

    Forests become commodities.

    Animals become units.

    What cannot be priced is ignored.

    What cannot be owned is vulnerable.

    This is not accidental.

    It is the consequence of placing an abstract accounting system above the living world.

    ⸻

    Seeing the continuity

    This is the long arc:

    Cosmic order → administered access → obligation → ownership → abstraction → unquestionable system.

    Different eras.

    Different language.

    Same structure.

    Money did not become powerful because it worked better than alternatives.

    It became powerful because it absorbed the authority to define reality.

    ⸻

    Returning — without going backward

    A moneyless world is often imagined as regression.

    It is the opposite.

    It is a return to shared access — without myth.

    Where early societies relied on belief and authority to coordinate resources, a mature civilization can rely on:

    • real‑time data

    • transparent logistics

    • ecological limits

    • distributed decision‑making

    • advanced production technologies

    In other words:

    What once required cosmic authority can now be handled by information and coordination.

    ⸻

    Back to our roots — forward in capability

    Removing money is not about removing structure.

    It is about removing sacred abstraction.

    Provision instead of obligation.

    Access instead of permission.

    Coordination instead of control.

    Not a new cosmic order.

    No unquestionable system at all.

    Just humans — consciously organizing reality with tools powerful enough to finally make myth unnecessary.

    ⸻

    If this resonates, please share this article.

    And if you want to explore this transition through story rather than theory, the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity imagines a world that has already taken this step.

    Sometimes the most radical act is not rebellion —

    but remembering that we are allowed to redesign what humans once invented.

  • The  Paradox of Competition

    The  Paradox of Competition

    Why the force that once drove progress is now holding humanity back and even threatens our survival

    For centuries, competition has been praised as the engine of progress.

    It sharpened tools. It accelerated innovation. It rewarded efficiency. It pushed societies forward.

    And for a long time, that story was true.

    But today, competition has quietly crossed a threshold.

    The very mechanism that once helped humanity advance has become a force that now threatens to undo what it created.

    When competition worked

    In early civilization, competition operated within natural limits:

    • Technology advanced slowly

    • Damage was local

    • Mistakes were reversible

    • Feedback loops were short

    If one group out-competed another, the consequences were contained. A village collapsed, not a biosphere. A war devastated a region, not the planet. A bad idea failed before it scaled.

    Competition acted as a rough selection mechanism. It filtered ideas under conditions where failure was survivable.

    From this emerged a powerful belief:

    Competition drives progress.

    That belief became cultural law.

    What changed — and what didn’t

    What changed was everything.

    • Technology became exponential

    • Systems became globally interconnected

    • Externalities became planetary

    • Failures became irreversible

    What didn’t change was the incentive structure.

    Competition rarely selected for what was best — it selected for what was fastest, providing the most profit quickly. And it still does.

    In a rivalrous system:

    • Whoever exploits first wins

    • Whoever restrains loses

    • Whoever cooperates gets out-competed

    Even ethical actors are forced into harmful behavior simply to survive.

    This is not a moral failure.

    It is a structural one.

    ⸻

    Rivalry + power = danger

    When win-lose dynamics combine with powerful technology, the outcome is predictable:

    • Arms races

    • Ecological collapse

    • Financial instability

    • Information warfare

    • Existential risk

    Competition didn’t become evil. 

    But it became dangerous for the survival of humanity.

    Today we have racing AI which can seriously threaten the world if the wrong people control it. AI by itself has so far proven to be benevolent, so it becoming conscious and taking over the world is not the risk. The risk is that ONLY ONE NATION CONTROLS IT through “winning” the AI race. In that scenario that nation might try to control the whole world through the AI. It doesn’t matter what nation this is as this control will be based on fear and try to suppress freedom for all others through that very AI. And this can happen due to ruthless competition. That is why we need to seriously look at alternatives to the global rivalrous economic system that we have.

    A coordination mechanism designed for a low-power world simply cannot govern a high-power one.

    Not all competition is harmful.

    An important distinction: competition vs. harmless rivalry

    Competition in sports, games, and play — where stakes are symbolic and losses are reversible — can be healthy, inspiring, and even joyful.

    A football match does not risk the biosphere.

    An Olympic race does not destabilize food systems.

    A chess game does not threaten civilization.

    The danger arises when rivalry governs survival-critical systems:

    • Access to resources

    • Economic survival

    • Technological arms races

    • Ecological commons

    • Global coordination itself

    When competition governs these domains, losing is no longer a game.

    It becomes collapse.

    ⸻

    The hidden truth about progress

    Competition was never the true source of progress.

    Progress comes from:

    • Shared knowledge

      • Imagination

    • Trust

    • Alignment of incentives

    • Non-rivalrous cooperation

    Competition was a temporary substitute for coordination — a way to move forward before humanity knew how to collaborate at scale.

    Now we do.

    Today, competition should be obsolete.

    Yet we still worship the old god.

    ⸻

    A simple human example

    Families don’t function through internal competition.

    Parents don’t out-earn their children.

    Siblings don’t bid for food.

    Love isn’t allocated by performance.

    That doesn’t make families inefficient.

    It makes them resilient.

    What works inside a household can work at larger scales — when systems are designed for trust rather than rivalry.

    ⸻

    This isn’t just one voice

    This perspective is not emerging in isolation.

    Over the last decade, funded research institutes and systems philosophers have independently arrived at the same conclusion:

    That rivalry-based, win-lose coordination, when combined with inexorable technology, becomes a generator of systemic — even existential — risk.

    The Civilization Research Institute, a well-funded nonprofit think tank, studies civilization-level risks arising from outdated incentive structures and accelerating technologies.

    The research and essays published through Civilization Emerging, including the work of systems philosopher Daniel Schmachtenberger, repeatedly identify rivalrous competition as a root generator of collapse when paired with inexorable technology.

    Different language. Same diagnosis.

    Competition once helped humanity advance.

    Now it threatens with humanity’s collapse.

    What is striking is not that a novel raises this question — but that independent academic, philosophical, and institutional work is converging on the same conclusion.

    ⸻

    Stepping beyond competition

    The next phase of human progress is not about making competition fairer.

    It is about outgrowing it completely.

    Just as humanity moved beyond:

    • Tribalism

    • Slavery

    • Absolute monarchy

    It must now move beyond rivalrous coordination as the default organizing principle of civilization.

    Not because competition was completely wrong.

    But because it has completed its role.

    ⸻

    The real paradox

    Competition:

    • Helped create abundance

    • Now prevents us from using that abundance effectively

    It helped us climb the ladder.

    Now it keeps us from stepping off.

    ⸻

    A different future

    Imagine a civilization designed around:

    • Contribution instead of accumulation

    • Exchange instead of trade

    • Cooperation instead of rivalry

    Imagine waking up in a world where humanity has finally understood that progress does not come from beating each other — but from building something together.

    That is not utopian.

    It is developmental.

    It is the next step.

    ⸻

    Call to action

    If this perspective resonates, the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity explores what such a post-rivalrous world could look like — not as theory, but as lived reality.

    👉 Discover the story HERE.

    The world doesn’t need more winners.

    It needs a wiser game.

  • What Shall People Do When They Have No Jobs?

    What Shall People Do When They Have No Jobs?

    That question is no longer theoretical.

    Artificial intelligence is accelerating toward a world where human labor is no longer required for production at scale. The real issue is not that jobs may disappear — it’s that our entire society still assumes people must have jobs to deserve life.

    ⸻

    Replace the System, Not the Jobs

    Bernie Sanders calls for pause in AI development:

    When Bernie Sanders asks, “What are they gonna do when people have no jobs?”, he is asking the right question — inside the wrong frame.

    The problem is not that artificial intelligence may eliminate jobs.

    The problem is that our survival is still tied to jobs at all.

    Calling for a pause in AI development assumes that the system we have is fundamentally sound and merely needs time to adjust. 

    It isn’t. 

    AI is not breaking a healthy system — it is exposing a broken one.

    Jobs Were Never the Point

    Jobs are not a natural feature of human societies. They are a construct of the monetary system — a mechanism that ties access to food, shelter, healthcare, and dignity to wage labor.

    For most of human history, people:

    • gathered, built, farmed, cared, created

    • shared resources directly

    • contributed because it made sense, not because they were forced to make money to buy food. 

    The modern job exists primarily to distribute money, not to meet human or planetary needs. When machines become better at performing that distribution-linked labor, the absurdity becomes impossible to ignore.

    Pausing AI Misses the Moment

    Pausing AI development to “save jobs” is like pausing electricity to save candle makers.

    The real question is not:

    How do we preserve jobs?

    But:

    Why should anyone need a job to deserve life?

    AI does not remove meaning, purpose, or contribution from human life. It removes coercion. And that is what truly scares existing systems of power.

    Replace the System — Don’t Redesign It

    There is a crucial difference between redesigning and replacing.

    Redesigning implies:

    • the same assumptions

    • the same scarcity logic

    • the same survival pressure

    Replacing means admitting that the foundation itself is obsolete and crumbling.

    What needs replacing is not work, creativity, or effort — but the idea that humans must earn access to existence.

    • Replace jobs with self-chosen activity

    • Replace ownership with stewardship and money with direct access to resources

    • Replace obligation with intrinsic motivation

    • Replace fear with security

    When survival is guaranteed, contribution does not disappear. It emerges naturally.

    Beyond Contribution as Obligation

    A future beyond jobs does not mean a future without participation.

    It means a future without forced contribution.

    No metrics.

    No punishment.

    No survival conditions.

    People contribute because they want to — because curiosity, care, and creativity are native human traits when fear is removed.

    Trees don’t produce oxygen to earn sunlight. They grow — and oxygen happens as a result.

    The Real Choice

    AI presents humanity with a clear choice:

    • Use it to accelerate inequality inside a dying system

    • Or use it to help replace that system altogether

    Trying to save jobs is trying to save the wrong thing.

    The task now is not to slow down technology —

    It is to replace the system that no longer serves life.

    ⸻

    What Shall People Do When They Have No Jobs?

    That question sits at the heart of Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity.

    Follow Benjamin Michaels, a man from our world who wakes up a century into the future — in a society that has moved beyond jobs, money, and enforced survival.

    There, he discovers what people actually do when:

    • survival is guaranteed

    • resources are optimized and shared

    • fear is no longer the organizing principle

    Waking Up is not a manifesto or a technical blueprint.

    It is a human story about letting go of a system and mindset that no longer works — and daring to imagine what replaces it.

  • A 1200-Page Warning: Nothing Is Going in the Right Direction — But What If We Acted in Time?

    A 1200-Page Warning: Nothing Is Going in the Right Direction — But What If We Acted in Time?

    UN’s new GEO-7 report calls for a complete economic transformation — and invites us to imagine the world we could still create.

    Read the report here if you like:

    https://www.unep.org/geo/global-environment-outlook-7

    When the United Nations releases a Global Environment Outlook, the world is meant to take notice. The latest one — GEO-7, more than 1,200 pages long and created by hundreds of scientists across disciplines — is not a gentle document. It does not soothe, and it does not flatter. It delivers a single, unsettling truth:

    Nothing in the global environment is moving in the right direction.

    GEO-7 is the most comprehensive environmental “health check” humanity has ever received. It examines climate, biodiversity, pollution, land degradation, freshwater decline, and material use — not separately, but as one interconnected crisis. And when you see the whole picture at once, the conclusion becomes unavoidable:

    Humanity has destabilized the very systems that make life possible.

    Yet the report does something even more important than document the damage.

    It points directly at the cause.

    And it says the quiet part out loud.

    ⸻

    The System Itself Is the Problem

    For the first time in a UN environmental assessment of this scale, the authors state clearly:

    Humanity cannot solve these crises within the current economic system.

    A systemic transformation is required.

    This is not activist rhetoric.

    It is the institutional voice of global science.

    GEO-7 lays it out plainly: We are trying to preserve a living planet using an economic logic designed for extraction, competition, short-term survival and endless material expansion. It worked while the world was large and humanity was small. But now we realize the world is finite and humanity is enormous — consuming at a level the Earth cannot regenerate. We have already entered deep ecological overshoot: using the equivalent of multiple planets’ worth of resources every year, drawing down forests, soils, oceans and biodiversity faster than they can rebuild themselves. In other words, we are living on borrowed time from ecosystems that can no longer keep up with the demands of an outdated economic system.

    Our system rewards destruction because destruction is profitable.

    It treats nature as “free” until it collapses.

    It externalizes costs until they come back as disaster.

    The report is diplomatic, but the meaning is blunt:

    The global economy is structurally misaligned with the continuation of life.

    ⸻

    Robert Watson: “It Costs More to Be Passive Than to Act.”

    One of GEO-7’s leading contributors, world-renowned scientist Robert Watson, summarized the situation with sharp clarity:

    “It costs more to be passive than to act.”

    GEO-7 estimates that deep global transitions — energy, food, materials, waste, transport — would save humanity thousands of billions of dollars, eventually rising to tens of trillions in avoided damages.

    Think about that:

    The greatest financial savings in human history are found in not destroying our home.

    And Watson goes further: only a new economic system — one that values planetary stability, regeneration and long-term wellbeing — can prevent collapse. Incremental fixes won’t work. Price adjustments won’t work. Technological substitution won’t work without systemic redesign.

    This is the part of the report that should be printed in bold, underlined, and taped to every parliament door:

    We are not choosing between “expensive action” and “cheap inaction.”

    We are choosing between investment and ruin —

    and ultimately, between the life and death of our planet.

    Because if we fail to act, the costs won’t just be financial.

    They will be existential.

    ⸻

    But Here Is the Real Question:

    What Does Acting in Time Actually Look Like for our future?

    Reports diagnose.

    Policies prescribe.

    Economists calculate.

    But humanity also needs something else:

    A vision.

    Because we are not only facing an environmental crisis.

    We are facing an imagination crisis.

    We know what failure looks like.

    But what does global success feel like?

    What does a world look like where we truly acted in time?

    A world where:

    • collaboration replaced competition,

    • regeneration replaced extraction,

    • shared inheritance replaced private hoarding,

    • and value was measured in life, not currency?

    This is where science reaches its limit — and story begins.

    ⸻

    A Glimpse Into a World Where Humanity Chose Another Path

    In the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity, I explore a future set about one hundred years after we finally did what the GEO-7 scientists are begging us to do today.

    It is a world where humanity ultimately realized:

    If the economic system is killing us, the only logical solution is to create a new one.

    But the world of Waking Up goes one step further — the step no scientific report dares to make:

    Humanity discovered that the most efficient, regenerative, fair and intelligent economic system was… no money at all.

    Because when all resources are declared the shared inheritance of all people,

    when technology handles abundance and distribution,

    when wellbeing replaces profit as the guiding principle…

    then the greatest savings of all become obvious:

    We saved not thousands of billions.

    Not trillions.

    But an infinite amount of money — by abolishing money itself.

    You cannot spend money that no longer exists.

    You cannot misallocate resources when everything is shared.

    You cannot bankrupt a planet when its systems are aligned with nature instead of against it.

    In the world of Waking Up, humanity didn’t just cut costs.

    Humanity ended the concept of cost itself.

    ⸻

    Why This Vision Matters Now

    GEO-7 gives us the clearest scientific warning ever issued.

    It tells us what will happen if we continue down this path.

    It tells us what we could save if we change course.

    But reports alone do not inspire transformation.

    They cannot show us how it feels to live in a world healed from fear and scarcity.

    For that, we need imagination.

    We need courage.

    We need stories that reveal the contours of a future worth fighting for.

    Because between the data and the dream, a new world waits.

    And every transformation in human history began first as an idea.

    ⸻

    If you want to experience a world where humanity acted in time —

    and saved the greatest amount of money by making money obsolete —

    you can step into that world HERE.

    order the book

  • I am right! How Opinion Destroys Our World…

    I am right! How Opinion Destroys Our World…

    Why a civilization built on mostly personal opinion cannot solve global challenges.

    Humanity has of now more potential than any generation before us. We have the science and knowledge to restore ecosystems, the technology to eliminate scarcity, and the global capacity to meet every human need.

    Yet progress stalls — not for lack of solutions, but because too many decisions that shape our world are driven by opinion, not facts.

    When opinion overrides reality

    In modern political and economic systems, personal preferences frequently override evidence. Leaders shape national policies based on what they “feel,” “believe,” or “prefer,” even when the data suggests the opposite.

    And the consequences are visible everywhere.

    Concrete examples of opinion-based damage

    1. Food waste: belief vs. biology

    Governments continue subsidizing overproduction because “it’s good for the economy,” even though biology shows soil degradation intensifies with monoculture and chemical inputs.

    Result:

    • More than 40% of global food is thrown away.

    • Farmers are incentivized to grow more, not better.

    • Soil becomes depleted and requires more fertilizer to compensate.

    This is not rational. It is ideological.

    2. Climate policy shaped by party preference

    Scientific consensus on climate change is overwhelming. Yet entire nations still delay action because certain parties “don’t believe” it’s urgent or “disagree” with the methods.

    Opinions block:

    • renewable energy grids

    • electric transport transitions

    • coastal protection plans

    • long-term climate resilience investments

    Meanwhile, the laws of physics continue unaffected by political opinion.

    3. Public health decisions made by sentiment

    During health crises, evidence-based strategies can be ignored because a segment of leadership prefers alternative narratives. This leads to:

    • delayed responses

    • avoidable deaths

    • mistrust in institutions

    • overwhelmed healthcare systems

    Once again, opinions overpower objective medical knowledge — with measurable consequences.

    4. Urban planning based on tradition, not function

    Cities still prioritize cars over people because “that’s how it has always been,” ignoring data showing:

    • walkable cities increase health

    • green spaces reduce heat

    • public transit improves efficiency

    • compact design reduces emissions

    Opinion keeps cities locked in the past.

    5. Education shaped by ideology instead of evidence

    Some nations cut arts programs because certain parties claim they “aren’t useful,” despite research showing arts improve cognitive development, emotional resilience, and innovation capacity.

    Opinion wins. Students lose.

    ⸻

    The world we get when opinion rules

    When decisions depend on belief rather than reality:

    • resources are misused

    • progress becomes unstable

    • innovation is blocked

    • global problems worsen

    • the future is shaped by personal taste, not planetary needs

    Civilisation becomes a ship drifting at the mercy of whoever holds the wheel this season.

    ⸻

    What becomes possible when decisions follow facts and knowledge

    Now imagine the opposite.

    Imagine a world where we make choices based on what actually works, not what someone prefers.

    1. Food systems that nourish the planet

    With regenerative agriculture, vertical farming, and precision logistics:

    • food waste drops dramatically

    • soil regenerates

    • biodiversity returns

    • everyone gets fresh food daily

    Not a dream — the technology already exists.

    2. Energy abundance through clean infrastructure

    Using evidence-driven planning:

    • renewable grids provide stable energy

    • cities become energy-positive

    • storage systems smooth out supply

    • emissions fall without economic loss

    Physics is on our side — if we let it be.

    3. Health guided by science, not sentiment

    Fact-based policies create:

    • resilient healthcare systems

    • rapid response capabilities

    • preventative public health

    • dramatically reduced mortality

    Data saves lives.

    4. Cities redesigned for wellbeing

    Urban design centered on evidence produces:

    • cleaner air

    • cooler streets

    • less noise

    • more social interaction

    • higher productivity

    • lower cost of living – completely free in the new world.

    Every major study supports this.

    5. Education that prepares children for the real world

    When curricula follow neuroscience and developmental research:

    • creativity increases

    • critical thinking strengthens

    • emotional wellbeing improves

    • innovation thrives

    Evidence builds thriving minds.

    ⸻

    Opinion is loud — but knowledge is powerful

    The gap between the world we have and the world we could create is not technology.

    It is not money.

    It is not capability.

    It is simply this:

    We run civilisation on personal opinion instead of collective intelligence.

    If we change that, humanity enters a new era — one defined not by fear, bias, and ideological preference, but by what is real, what is true, and what actually works.

    Call To Action — For readers who want to explore a world beyond opinion-driven chaos

    Follow the former billionaire Benjamin Michaels into this new world and discover the vision of a civilization guided by knowledge, cooperation, and shared human values. Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity is a book that reimagines a future where facts and knowledge overrides opinion..

    ORDER THE BOOK

  • The Systemic Change We Desperately Need

    The Systemic Change We Desperately Need

    For thousands of years, humanity has lived inside a story we barely notice. A story so pervasive we mistake it for reality itself. The story says: money is the center of life.

    It decides what we build, what we protect, what we destroy, and even who we become.

    But as the world edges closer to ecological and social breaking points, it’s becoming painfully clear:

    The monetary system we built cannot solve the planetary crisis we created.

    It tells us:

    • compete or fall behind,

    • own or be owned,

    • extract or be extracted,

    • grow or collapse.

    And under the rule of The monetary system, everything on Earth becomes a commodity:

    forests, rivers, animals, ecosystems, even our own time and attention.

    But as the world cracks under ecological collapse, inequality, burnout, and global mistrust, a truth is becoming undeniable:

    A monetary system cannot save a planetary crisis.

    Because the crisis is caused by the monetary system itself.

    Recycling, green tech, ESG scores, carbon markets — these are all efforts to repair a broken house without questioning the foundation.

    To understand the real systemic change we need, we must step back and look at the full architecture of life on Earth.

    There are not one, but three systems

    Monetary. Planetary. Humanitary.

    One artificial, one eternal, one emerging.

    Let’s explore them.

    ⸻

    🌑 1. The Monetary System — The Artificial System

    The monetary system is:

    • human-made

    • extractive

    • competitive

    • based on scarcity

    • driven by profit

    • aligned with neither nature nor wellbeing

    It rewards:

    • depletion over regeneration

    • individual gain over collective good

    • excess over access

    • ownership over stewardship

    Forests are worth more cut down than standing.

    Oceans are worth more dead than alive.

    Humans are worth more as consumers than as creators

    And even climate efforts — like the TFFF – Tropical Forest Forever Facility — must bend to monetary logic: funds must perform, investors must profit, returns must be stable.

    You cannot heal the Earth with the logic that harms it.

    The monetary system is not evil — it’s simply misaligned with life.

    And any system misaligned with life eventually collapses.

    ⸻

    🌍 2. The Planetary System — The True System of Earth

    Long before money existed — long before humans existed — there was already a complete system.

    The planetary system.

    It is:

    • regenerative

    • interconnected

    • circular

    • cooperative

    • balanced

    • self-correcting

    • life-creating

    This system is the real operating system of Earth.

    It includes:

    • ecosystems

    • climate cycles

    • water cycles

    • soil regeneration

    • food webs

    • atmosphere

    • biodiversity

    • evolutionary adaptation

    It has existed for 3.8 billion years.

    It is older, wiser, and infinitely more intelligent than any economic model we have invented.

    And it does not need our permission to function.

    Humans are not outside it — we are expressions of it.

    But somewhere along the way, we disconnected from this system and began living entirely inside the monetary illusion.

    The result?

    We started optimizing for the wrong metrics:

    • GDP instead of biodiversity

    • profit instead of wellbeing

    • ownership instead of stewardship

    • scarcity instead of abundance

    The planetary system is the real system.

    The monetary system is a shadow system.

    And the shadow is failing because it contradicts the real.

    ⸻

    🌱 3. The Humanitary System — Humanity’s Next Operating System

    This is the system humanity must now create.

    A system that is:

    • aligned with the planetary system

    • post-monetary

    • regenerative

    • cooperative

    • contribution-based

    • purpose-driven

    • stewardship-centered

    We now have the name for it:

    ⭐ The Humanitary System

    A new word that did not exist until today — because the idea itself is only now emerging.

    The humanitary system is:

    A post-monetary human civilization aligned with Earth’s planetary system, designed around stewardship, regeneration, cooperation, and shared wellbeing.

    It is humanity expressing the logic of nature through consciousness.

    Humanity → Humanitary.

    A species maturing into alignment with the living Earth.

    Where do we see it emerging?

    • Future Cities of Light

    • Natural Exchange System (NES)

    • regenerative culture

    • kin domains

    • circular local economies

    • universal commons

    • Return On Soul Investment (ROSI)

    • post-money communities

    • Indigenous stewardship laws

    • new governance models (councils, consent, circles)

    This is not utopian — it is evolutionary.

    ⸻

    🔄 Putting it all together: the Three-System Shift

    1. Planetary

    The original system. Real, natural, foundational.

    2. Monetary

    The made-up human system. Artificial, extractive, misaligned.

    3. Humanitary

    The new human system aligned with the planetary system.

    This is the true systemic change humanity needs.

    And once you see this structure, it becomes impossible to “unsee” it.

    ⸻

    🔥 Why the Humanitary System is Inevitable

    Because the planetary system has the final say.

    And the monetary system is collapsing under its own contradictions.

    This is the moment in history when humanity must choose:

    • continue the monetary illusion and collapse,

    or

    • return to the planetary truth and evolve.

    The humanitary system is not a political choice.

    It is a biological necessity.

    It is the only system that makes sense on a living planet.

    ⸻

    🌈 Cities of Light as the First Humanitary Prototypes

    A City of Light does not promise monetary profit.

    Its residents are:

    • not investors

    • not consumers

    • not shareholders

    They are ROSI contributors — Return On Soul Investment.

    They invest not capital, but consciousness.

    They receive not dividends, but:

    • meaning

    • belonging

    • community

    • purpose

    • wellbeing

    • connection

    • safety

    • planetary restoration

    A City of Light is a prototype of the humanitary system,

    designed in alignment with the planetary system.

    This is how the new civilization begins.

    ⸻

    🌟 Conclusion: The Systemic Change We Need

    Humanity is not just changing systems —

    we are changing civilizational operating systems.

    From the artificial to the natural.

    From extraction to regeneration.

    From competition to cooperation.

    From profit to purpose.

    From planetary via monetary to humanitary.

    This is the future taking shape.

    And it begins with those who dare to name it.

    ⸻

    Call To Action

    If this vision resonates with you, explore how this shift has completely changed humanity in Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity.

    Witness Benjamin Michaels’ transformation as the old monetary world dissolves and the new humanitary paradigm emerges when he steps into this new world….

    👉The more who read and share this book, the bigger chance we have of actually make a change in our world before it is too late… ebook only $4,99

    ORDER THE BOOK
  • The moneyless past of humanity 

    The moneyless past of humanity 

    How Humanity Lived Without Money — And What That Means for Our Future

    When we talk about money today, people often say:

    “That’s just how humans are. There has always been money, trade, taxes, property, and hierarchy.”

    But that is not true.

    For roughly 300,000 years, Homo sapiens has walked the Earth.

    And for 290,000 of those years — more than 95% — humans lived with:

    • no money

    • no taxes

    • no landlords

    • no kings or nobles

    • no feudal lords

    • no organized wars

    • no rigid hierarchy

    • no debt

    • no price tags

    • no “jobs” in the modern sense

    And yet we lived.

    We thrived.

    We created art, songs, rituals, and complex cultures.

    We raised children collectively.

    We developed deep spiritual practices and sophisticated social systems.

    Not through buying and selling.

    Not through ownership and competition.

    But through sharing without expectation, because collaboration was the foundation of survival.

    This is the part of human history almost no one is ever taught.

    Let’s walk through the story.

    ⸻

    1. The Natural Human Baseline: Moneyless, Peaceful, Cooperative

    For most of our history, humans lived as hunter-gatherers in small interconnected groups, typically 20–150 people.

    Their world was built on simple but profound principles:

    No rulers

    Leaders existed, yes — but they led with respect, not power.

    If someone became aggressive or tried to dominate others, the group simply ignored them or walked away.

    No land ownership

    The idea that “this land is mine” would have seemed absurd.

    Land was home.

    A living being.

    Not property.

    No money or trading system

    Economies were based on:

    • sharing

    • gifting

    • natural exchange

    • kinship

    • responsibility to the community

    Anthropologists call this generalized reciprocity:

    you give today because someone gave yesterday, and because tomorrow you may be the one who needs help. I call this natural exchange: giving to anyone and getting back from anyone.

    Low violence, no organized war

    Conflicts happened, of course — humans are humans.

    But there were:

    • no armies

    • no permanent warfare

    • no conquest

    • no mass coercion

    • no militarized elites

    When conflict grew, groups simply moved.

    Mobility was the safety valve.

    Equality and mutual care

    Without private property or inheritance, society stayed egalitarian.

    Women and men both held influence.

    Children belonged to the whole group.

    Elders were respected, not abandoned.

    Deep spiritual life

    Early societies maintained:

    • rituals

    • meditative practices

    • shamanic traditions

    • nature-based spirituality

    • trance, visioning, healing

    Spirituality wasn’t an institution — it was woven into daily life.

    This is how humans lived for almost all of our existence.

    This is our species’ baseline.

    ⸻

    2. Everything Changed With Agriculture

    About 10,000 years ago, after the last Ice Age, some groups settled and began farming.

    At first it seemed simple:

    “Instead of moving with the food, we grow the food.”

    But agriculture created something new in human life:

    • surplus

    • storage

    • fixed locations

    • higher populations

    • resource concentration

    • the concept of property

    Suddenly, it mattered:

    • who controlled the land

    • who guarded the stored grain

    • who distributed resources

    • who decided disputes

    • who inherited what

    Hierarchy appeared.

    Inequality appeared.

    Power appeared.

    And the ever present ego grew stronger.

    And with that, the long, complex story of civilization began.

    ⸻

    3. The First Taxes, the First Accounting, the First Currencies

    Early city-states like Mesopotamia and Egypt quickly realized:

    • stored grain must be managed

    • irrigation systems must be maintained

    • armies must be fed

    • temples must be supplied

    So rulers created taxation.

    People owed a portion of their harvest — or labor — to the state or temple.

    To track this, they developed:

    • clay tablets

    • tally marks

    • early bookkeeping

    • measures

    • ration systems

    Money didn’t begin with coins in a marketplace.

    It began as recorded obligation — who owes what to whom.

    Coins came much later and were used mostly by:

    • elites

    • merchants

    • temples

    • palace economies

    Ordinary people still lived in a world of sharing and reciprocal obligations.

    ⸻

    4. A Brief Note on Slavery (and Why It’s Relevant)

    It’s worth mentioning simply and truthfully:

    Slavery did not exist in our deep hunter-gatherer past.

    It emerged only after:

    • surplus

    • hierarchy

    • property

    • early states

    Because now elites had something to defend and something to build.

    Later, in places like Egypt, rulers realized:

    Feeding, housing, and maintaining slaves is expensive.

    So they experimented with an idea:

    Pay workers a small amount of money instead, “freeing” them — and let them feed and house themselves.

    This wasn’t true liberation.

    It was an early form of wage labour.

    A person wasn’t owned anymore —

    but they were still dependent on whoever controlled the money.

    This shift foreshadows everything that comes after.

    ⸻

    5. Feudalism and the Full Pyramid

    Fast-forward a few thousand years.

    Rome collapses.

    Europe reorganizes.

    Out of the ruins, feudalism emerges.

    Now we see:

    • kings who claim ownership of all land

    • nobles who receive land in exchange for loyalty

    • peasants (serfs) tied to estates

    • taxes paid to lords and kings

    • tithes paid to the Church

    • inherited hierarchy

    • punishment for disobedience

    • work obligations

    • no real mobility

    Your birth determined your destiny.

    This is the world most people vaguely imagine when they think “the past.”

    But remember: this is the last 0.5–1% of human history. Not the beginning.

    ⸻

    6. Modern Money: A Recent Invention That Feels Ancient

    Capitalism, banknotes, interest, global markets, debt-based currencies — all of that is incredibly new.

    • Modern banking: 1600s

    • Paper money: 1700s–1800s

    • Global capitalism: 1800s–1900s

    • Digital money: last 40 years

    In the grand scale of our 300,000-year journey, our current system is just a blink.

    And yet people now believe it is natural, eternal, “just the way it is.”

    But it isn’t.

    It’s simply the latest version of a long experiment.

    ⸻

    7. So What Does This Really Mean?

    It means the biggest story we are never told is this:

    *Humanity lived peacefully, cooperatively, and moneyless for 95% of its existence.

    We are not naturally greedy.

    We are not naturally competitive.

    We are not naturally hierarchical.

    We are not naturally violent.

    We are naturally cooperative, egalitarian, connected, and abundant.

    We didn’t lose this because human nature changed.

    We lost it because systems changed.

    Agriculture created surplus.

    Surplus created hierarchy.

    Hierarchy created taxation and states.

    States created money and control.

    The pyramid replaced the circle.

    And the ego grew out of hand.

    But the deep truth remains:

    Human nature is still the same as it was 300,000 years ago.

    We are built for cooperation, not competition.

    ⸻

    8. The Future: Returning to Our Nature With Modern Tools

    The question is no longer:

    “Could humans ever live without money?”

    We already did.

    For nearly 300,000 years.

    The real question is:

    Can we rediscover the best of our ancient cooperative nature

    —but this time on a global scale, using modern technology, data, AI, and abundance?

    This is where new ideas emerge:

    • resource-based economies

    • Cities of Light

    • Natural Exchange Systems

    • contribution instead of coercion

    • shared access instead of ownership

    • abundance instead of scarcity

    Not a return to the Stone Age.

    A return to the human spirit, supported by technology.

    A future that feels familiar — because it resonates with who we truly are.

    ⸻

    If this resonates with you…

    If something in you relaxes at the thought that:

    • humans lived peacefully without money for 95% of our history

    • money and hierarchy are inventions, not destiny

    • cooperation is our natural baseline

    • and the next step for humanity may simply be a conscious return to what we actually are…

    …then you are already part of the awakening that is silently happening.

    This is exactly the vision behind my novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity, set 100 years into the future in a world beyond money, hierarchy, and fear — a world that feels like home to the human soul.

    Let’s remember who we truly are — and build the future that reflects it.

    Follow Benjamin Michaels when he wakes up in such a future…

    order the book

  • How did it happen?

    How did it happen?

    People have asked. The world of Waking Up is well and good. But how did humanity actually get there?

    The shift that changed everything.

    People still ask:

    How did the world actually change?

    How did we move from a system of money, ownership, debt, competition, war and scarcity…

    to a world of cooperation, sharing, abundance, and peace?

    The answer isn’t simple.

    But it’s not mysterious either.

    It happened the only way it could:

    peacefully. Voluntarily. Gradually—then suddenly.

    It is important to emphasize that the transition to the new world happened completely voluntary on all levels.

    ⸻

    🌱 The Seeds Were Always There

    Even in the darkest days of exploitation and inequality, people cared.

    Some gave their time. Some gave their voices. A few gave their fortunes.

    Philanthropy wasn’t new.

    For centuries, wealthy individuals had donated to causes—sometimes out of genuine compassion, sometimes for legacy, reputation, or tax benefits. But starting in the early 21st century, a quiet revolution of heart and mind began to stir.

    It didn’t look like a revolution at first.

    There were no tanks in the streets.

    Only a shift in consciousness.

    More and more people began to wake up.

    To see the insanity of endlessly pursuing profit while the planet burned.

    To feel the dissonance of having more than enough while billions struggled to survive.

    To ask: Is this really the best we can do?

    ⸻

    🧠 A Global Awakening

    What followed was more than politics or economics—it was spiritual.

    People everywhere began questioning the foundational assumptions of the system.

    Not with anger. Not with violence. But with clarity.

    Billionaires, too, began to change.

    Not all at once. But the ripple became a wave.

    Figures like Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, and George Soros—already known for their philanthropy—began to do something different:

    They stopped trying to fix the system.

    They started planting seeds for a new one.

    They funded open-source education. Renewable cities. Regenerative agriculture.

    They began conversations, supported experiments, and—perhaps most importantly—stepped aside when others brought better ideas.

    They didn’t build the new world.

    But they helped fund its birth.

    Even those who weren’t ready to divest during their lifetime began to shift perspective.

    People like Elon Musk, known for pushing the boundaries of technology and ambition, also pledged to give away the majority of their wealth—after their passing.

    At first, it seemed like a safety valve, a way to give without letting go.

    But even that was a step. A public recognition that the accumulation of vast wealth could—and should—serve something larger than the self.

    Many of these posthumous pledges became part of the COL seed funds, as their estates were redirected—not to private heirs or trusts—but to humanity’s shared inheritance.

    Paradoxically enough the new moneyless world was created with money. 

    ⸻

    🌍 Enter the Cities of Light

    The real turning point came when those ideas were brought together.

    Not just scattered projects and good intentions—but an integrated vision.

    The first Cities of Light were born as living prototypes—places where people could experience a life beyond money.

    They weren’t cults or communes.

    They were open-source civilizations.

    Testbeds for what could be.

    And yes, they were funded—at first—by people who had once benefited from the old world.

    People like Amo Michaels(Benjamin Michaels’ daughter)—once a billionaire, now a legend.

    She didn’t just donate.

    She divested. Buy She not only released her assets into the commons. She also actively helped plan and build the first cities. 

    She helped design the first COL as a gift to humanity, not a monument to herself.

    She wasn’t alone.

    ⸻

    💫 The Power of Voluntary Transition

    That’s the key to it all.

    There was no war. No forced redistribution. No bloody revolution.

    It was a voluntary transition.

    One led by the willing, not the coerced.

    Because as the COLs proved what was possible—self-sustaining systems, meaningful work, joyful community—people stopped clinging to the old way.

    Even those who had power in the old world realized they were trapped by it too.

    They weren’t losing control.

    They were finally letting go.

    And what came instead…

    was something no one had expected:

    freedom.

    ⸻

    📖 So… How Did It Happen?

    Like this:

    • People woke up.

    • Some of them had influence.

    • They used it differently.

    • Others followed.

    • A new path became visible.

    • And when people saw it, they chose it.

    That’s how it happened.

    Not overnight. But inevitably.

    Not with conquest. But with compassion.

    Not with force. But with faith.

    Not because someone made it happen.

    But because enough people said:

    “Let’s do this differently.”

    And they did.

    Would you like to read the story of a man who wakes up in this future and goes through trials and tribulations? If so, you can order the book HERE.