Tag: MONEY

  • Culture vs. Money — What Came First?

    Culture vs. Money — What Came First?

    Watching Gordon Ramsay: Uncharted travel through Galicia Spain, harvesting percebes from wave-beaten rocks, bidding on fish at early-morning auctions, and cooking food rooted deeply in place, a simple question naturally arises:

    Would people still do all this if there were no money?

    It’s a fair question — and also a revealing one.

    Because what we are actually watching in Galicia is not an economy.

    We are watching a culture.

    Culture came first

    Fishing cultures, farming cultures, herding cultures, food cultures, craft cultures — all of them existed long before the modern monetary system. People did not begin fishing because of auctions. They did not start making cheese because of profit margins. They did these things because:

    • it was who they were

    • it was how knowledge was passed down

    • it created belonging and pride

    • it connected them to land, sea, and community

    • it gave meaning to daily life

    • it gave them food on the table

    Money arrived later. Much later. And when it arrived, it wrapped itself around these activities as a coordination layer — not as their source.

    Money coordinate — it does not motivate

    We often confuse coordination with motivation.

    Auctions, prices, bids, and markets help coordinate distribution under scarcity. They do not explain why people go out into dangerous seas, master difficult skills, or continue traditions that take decades to learn.

    Those motivations are older and deeper:

    • identity

    • mastery

    • contribution

    • respect

    • continuity

    • love of the craft

    Remove money, and the need for coordination remains — but the reasons for doing the work do not disappear.

    What disappears without money — and what doesn’t

    What disappears:

    • artificial scarcity

    • speculative bidding

    • over-extraction for profit

    • middlemen extracting value

    • pressure to work dangerously because of debt

    What remains:

    • fishing

    • cheesemaking

    • farming

    • cooking

    • skill and pride

    • reputation based on excellence

    • rituals, festivals, and traditions

    In fact, many cultures would function better without monetary pressure distorting them.

    Coordination without coercion

    In a post-monetary world, coordination would be based on:

    • real needs instead of price signals

    • logistics instead of competition

    • reputation instead of wealth

    • cooperation instead of bidding wars

    People would still want good food, beautiful craft, and skilled work. They just wouldn’t need financial scarcity to decide who deserves access.

    Play survives economics

    Interestingly, some old systems might even survive — but as play.

    Mock auctions, ritualized bidding, historical reenactments, and LARP(Live Acton Role Playing)-like traditions could remain because humans enjoy drama, ritual, and performance. The difference is simple but profound:

    No one’s survival would depend on winning the game.

    The deeper misunderstanding

    The hardest idea for many people to release is the belief that:

    “Without money, nobody would do the work.”

    But this is contradicted every day by:

    • parenting

    • art

    • volunteering

    • caregiving

    • community building

    • cultural preservation

    Humans are not motivated primarily by money.

    We are motivated by meaning.

    ⸻

    Pono — An Example of the Future That Already Exists

    Watching Gordon Ramsay: Uncharted again. In Hawaii this time there are several quiet moments that say more about humanity’s future than a thousand economic theories. Not because Hawaii is unique or superior — but because it preserves something that exists everywhere, once you know how to see it.

    Ramsay learns to make a knife from a Hawaiian knife smith. No factory. No production line. Just hands, fire, steel, patience — and pride in the craft.

    Earlier, he is introduced to pono by a local chef. Hawaiian culture becomes the lens here — not as an exception, but as a clear example of something fundamentally human. He visits coffee farms where every single bean is hand-picked — not because it is efficient in monetary terms, but because care, respect, and right relationship matter.

    That moment already carries the essence of pono.

    Then the thought arises naturally:

    If this knife smith were not paid for his knives, would he still make them?

    Anyone paying attention already knows the answer.

    Yes.

    Craft does not originate in money

    People like this knife smith do not exist because of money. They exist because of:

    • curiosity

    • mastery

    • identity

    • interest

    • the simple joy of doing something well

    Money comes later, as a translation layer — a blunt instrument used to move objects through a system that no longer trusts relationships.

    Take money away, and the craft does not disappear.

    What changes is how the craft flows.

    Without money, distribution becomes personal

    If the knife smith were not selling knives to an anonymous market, he would still make them — but he would make them for someone.

    A fisherman.

    A cook.

    A farmer.

    A neighbor.

    Each knife would have a face attached to it.

    Each knife would have a story.

    The question would no longer be:

    What can I get for this?

    It would become:

    Who is this for, and what do they need?

    That is not sentimentality.

    It is precision.

    Fewer knives, perhaps — but each one more exact, more fitting, more meaningful.

    Pono as systems intelligence

    In Hawaiian culture, pono means balance, right relationship, and corrective harmony — not moral purity or rule-following.

    The hand-picked coffee beans matter here. Not as a luxury product, but as a signal: how something is done matters as much as what is produced.

    An action is pono if it restores balance:

    • between people

    • between people and land

    • between effort and need

    The traditional Hawaiian ahupuaʻa system worked this way. Resources were not owned, priced, or extracted for growth. They were stewarded as flows — from mountain to sea — with the understanding that excess in one place meant harm elsewhere.

    That is not nostalgia.

    That is systems intelligence.

    Culture precedes money — and survives without it

    Fishing, farming, cooking, building, teaching, caring.

    These activities existed long before money — and they continue today wherever culture is allowed to breathe.

    This quietly answers the question critics always ask:

    “But why would people do anything without money?”

    Because they already do.

    You just have to stop filtering reality through price tags.

    Money did not create meaning.

    It replaced relationship with abstraction.

    Culture outlives systems

    Economic systems rise and fall.

    Cultures endure.

    Galician fishers will still fish.

    Not because of auctions.

    But because it is who they are.

    And once that is truly understood, the idea of a good life without money stops sounding radical — and starts  sounding natural and deeply human.

    ⸻

    If this way of thinking resonates, the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity explores what happens when humanity organizes around cooperation, culture, and care instead of money — and reveals that the future we imagine may already be quietly alive among us. Dive into the story through Benjamin Michaels, the lost billionaire waking up in a future like this.

  • The Great Unveiling – Awakening to the Real World

    The Great Unveiling – Awakening to the Real World

    What would actually happen if the world erased all debt overnight?

    ⸻

    1. The Starting Point

    Let’s start with a fact, not an opinion.

    As of 2025, total global debt is about $340 trillion — every mortgage, every student loan, every government bond, every corporate IOU combined.

    It is, quite literally, the sum of what humanity owes to itself.

    Let that sink in.

    To itself.

    How can a species owe itself money?

    How can the left hand be in debt to the right?

    The numbers are real enough on paper — but the logic behind them is absurd.

    We’ve built a global system in which humanity as a whole is perpetually indebted to… humanity as a whole.

    Meanwhile, the world’s annual GGP, Gross Global Product— the total value of everything we actually create and produce — is about $110 trillion.

    So globally we owe more than three times what we make in a year.

    We are, in effect, trying to pay ourselves with our own promises, and calling the shortfall “growth.”

    ⸻

    2. The Paradox of Debt-Money

    Here’s the strange truth of modern economics:

    Money isn’t printed first and then lent — it’s created by lending.

    When a bank issues a loan, it simply types numbers into an account.

    Those digits are new money, but they exist only because someone has agreed to owe them back.

    For every dollar of money, there’s a dollar of debt somewhere else. So of course, since we are constantly creating new money mostly by loans that needs to be repaid with interest which is not created, we constantly need to create new debt perpetually. If everyone repaid their loans tomorrow, almost every dollar in existence would vanish.

    The economy wouldn’t just slow down — it would cease to exist. Because money = debt.

    Debt isn’t a flaw in the system.

    Debt is the system.

    ⸻

    3. The Absurd Scale

    Three hundred and forty trillion dollars.

    A number so large it almost loses meaning.

    To “repay” it, we’d need about three more Earth-sized economies operating at today’s output — three planets producing, mining, farming, shipping, and consuming at full speed just to settle our existing balance sheet.

    But we have only one planet, and it’s already showing the strain: melting ice caps, depleting soils, rising seas.

    We’ve mortgaged the future to pay for the present, and even the collateral — the planet itself — is running out.

    The debt can never be repaid, because repayment would destroy the very money supply that makes repayment possible. The paradox is profound

    It’s a snake eating its own tail.

    ⸻

    4. The Thought Experiment

    So what if, instead of running faster on the treadmill, we simply stopped?

    What if: every government, bank, and individual agreed to wipe the slate clean — erase all debt at once?

    Technically, it would be easy.

    After all, when a bank issues a loan, it simply types numbers into an account.

    Those digits appear from nowhere, authorized by nothing more than confidence in the story.

    And just as easily as they’re created, they can be erased.

    The same keyboard that made them has another key — 

    backspace.

    Press it once for a typo.

    Press it a few more times, and the world is debt-free.

    Thus: the so-called global “debt crisis” is nothing more than a collection of keystrokes. 

    The difficulty isn’t technical. 

    It’s psychological.

    The moment those numbers disappear, the story humanity believes about itself — the story of credit, ownership, and fake obligation — vanishes with them.

    For a few hours, maybe days, the world would panic.

    Markets would freeze. Banks would have no assets. Governments would have no bonds.

    It would look like collapse.

    But collapse of what, exactly?

    ⸻

    5. What Would Still Exist

    Would the roads disappear?

    Would the houses crumble?

    Would the hospitals and schools evaporate?

    Would the oceans stop moving or the sun fail to shine?

    No.

    Every physical thing humanity has built and nature has created would still be there:

    every bridge, every farm, every power plant, every tool, every ship.

    The forests, the animals, the wind and rain — all still exactly as before.

    The real world would remain completely intact.

    The only thing missing would be the numbers we used to measure it.

    That’s the realization: the “economy” we thought sustained us was only a layer of code floating above what was real.

    When the code is erased, the world itself doesn’t vanish

    — it appears.

    ⸻

    6. The Great Unveiling

    That’s the unveiling — the moment when the illusion drops and we see what was always there.

    The money world was never the world.

    It was a veil — a story of ownership drawn over nature, over work, over life itself.

    When that story ends, nothing real is lost.

    In fact, reality becomes visible again.

    The forests keep breathing.

    The clouds still drift and drop rain.

    Birds still fly, insects still hum, whales still cross the oceans.

    People still wake up, stretch, laugh, argue, cook, and create.

    All of it continues as if nothing happened — because to the real world, nothing did.

    ⸻

    7. Seeing the Illusion for What It Was

    Imagine standing in a field the morning after the Great Erasure.

    The banks are silent, the stock tickers blank, but the sun still warms your skin.

    You realize how strange it was to think that this — sunlight, air, grass, breath — could ever be “priced.”

    The absurdity becomes obvious: we built a system that claims ownership over everything that already belongs to life.

    We invented scarcity in the middle of abundance. Saying only those with enough numbers in their accounts would have an abundance of time to really enjoy life.

    We called debt wealth and competition progress.

    We covered the real world with a mirage of money — and then forgot it was a mirage.

    And yet, beneath that mirage, everything real has been patiently waiting.

    ⸻

    8. What Happens Next

    At first, confusion.

    If no one owns anything, who decides?

    But slowly, reason returns.

    People realize they don’t need permission to use what already exists. 

    Food still grows. Tools still work. Knowledge still lives in every mind. We can peacefully agree to create abundance for all.

    Communities reorganize — not around money, but around contribution, skill, and trust.

    Value shifts from possession to participation.

    Humanity begins to live again as nature does — through exchange without debt, through cycles of giving and renewal.

    ⸻

    9. The Realization

    The true catastrophe isn’t the collapse of the money world — it’s that we mistook it for the real one.

    The true awakening is realizing the world doesn’t need to be rebuilt — only remembered.

    Everything that matters survives the erasure:

    the land, the oceans, the people, the animals, the insects, the sky, the sun.

    When the numbers vanish, what remains is life — unpriced, unowned, unending.

    ⸻

    10. The Invitation

    This is the Great Unveiling: not the end of civilization, but the end of its disguise.

    A collective seeing — that the wealth of the world was never in banks, but in being.

    Step outside.

    Feel the ground.

    Everything real is still here.

    The world is Waking Up.

    Are you?

    Follow the former billionaire Benjamin Michaels as he wakes up in a world where this has already happened. Shaken and shocked he staggers out of the hospital where he has been sleeping for a century, only to find his old world of money and numbers completely vanished… Only the real world remains.

    order the book here

  • The Idiocracy of Our Time

    The Idiocracy of Our Time

    The United States just shut down parts of its government. Not because the farmers stopped farming. Not because the engineers forgot how to build. Not because the doctors ran out of knowledge.

    But because two groups of politicians couldn’t agree on numbers in a spreadsheet.

    750,000 people furloughed. Families in limbo. Services halted. The world’s “biggest economy” brought to its knees by idiotic accounting games.

    Money as Oxygen

    This is the Idiocracy of our time: we treat money as if it were oxygen. We act as if society cannot breathe without it. Yet money produces nothing. It grows no food, builds no homes, heals no bodies. It is only the token system we invented and forgot was fiction. Time to call it a day?

    History shows us that human societies have not always been shackled to money:

    • Indigenous cultures across the Americas and Australia sustained themselves for millennia through direct sharing of food, tools, and shelter — no coins, no ledgers.

    • Medieval villages in Europe often relied on collective effort and community support, where needs were met without currency.

    • Disaster relief today shows the same principle: when hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods strike, people don’t wait for budgets to be approved. Neighbors help neighbors, resources flow, and life continues.

    What if instead of shutting down when the tokens run out, we simply looked at what is real..?

    • Resources

    • Skills

    • Needs

    • Collaboration

    The things that actually make life work

    Imagine a world where monetary budgets don’t exist, but abundance does. Where we don’t ask, “Can we afford it?” but rather, “Do the resources exist, and does it serve life?”

    That’s not a fantasy. It’s the next step for humanity. Because as long as we play by the rules of monopoly money, we’ll keep watching governments collapse over nothing.

    Time to step out of the Idiocracy — and into a world that works for all

    We could create such a world if we really wanted to, as long as enough people become aware of the possibility. And that is exactly what the book,Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity, is about. Making people aware through story.

    Are you curious?

    If you want to glimpse what such a future might look like, step into the story of Waking Up. Follow Benjamin Michaels, a former billionaire who opens his eyes 100 years in his future in a world where money has been abandoned — where access, cooperation, and abundance have replaced scarcity and competition. No more fight over budgets. No more polarization. Humanity has realized we have to work together to keep living on this planet. Ben’s  journey is a window into what life could be like beyond the illusion of money and scarcity.

    👉 Read the novel Waking Up — a journey towards a new dawn for humanity:

    ORDER HERE

    ⸻

  • Can More Money Save the World?

    Can More Money Save the World?

    We think that money is the solution to everything. Pouring more of it over problems should make them go away, right?

    A Billionaire’s Promise

    When Bill Gates pledged to give away 99% of his fortune — over $200 billion — to be spent by 2045, headlines called it one of the greatest philanthropic commitments in history. Health, hunger, education, climate: the problems are massive, and Gates believes that with enough money, the right science, and smart management, they can be solved.

    But can they?

    The Promise of Money

    At first glance, it’s hard not to be impressed. $200 billion could vaccinate entire regions, build schools, fund green energy projects, and support struggling farmers. Money, in this sense, looks like a universal key — a tool that can unlock progress wherever it is directed. That’s the belief that fuels philanthropy on this scale: the more dollars we mobilize, the faster we can fix the world.

    The Contradiction at the Core

    Yet beneath the surface lies a contradiction too big to ignore. If money created these problems, can money really be the solution?

    Poverty Is Built Into the System

    Consider poverty. Philanthropy can deliver food, medicine, or shelter to people in need — and it does save lives. But poverty itself is not a shortage of money; it is the direct result of how money organizes society.

    Money only works when it is scarce. If everyone had an abundance, it would stop functioning altogether. Its value comes from the fact that not everyone has it, and that you must trade your time, labor, or resources to get it. If everyone suddenly had “enough,” prices would simply rise until scarcity returned.

    In other words, poverty is not a tragic accident of the system — it is a requirement. For money to keep its value, some people must always be excluded. The system itself ensures that wages are kept low, debts are enforced, and resources are concentrated, not because there isn’t enough food, housing, or energy, but because without inequality, money itself would collapse. Wealth and poverty are not opposites; they are two sides of the same coin.

    Climate Change and Profit Logic

    The same is true of climate change. Gates has invested in carbon capture, nuclear power, and green innovation. But climate chaos is not only an energy problem — it is a system problem. Our economy thrives on extraction, waste, and endless growth. Injecting more money into cleaner versions of the same system does not change its core logic: profit above planet.

    The problem is not that we lack the technology to live sustainably, but that our economic model rewards short-term gain and punishes restraint. As long as money drives the logic, even philanthropy cannot stop industries from consuming the Earth in pursuit of growth.

    Power and Inequality

    And then there’s power. When one man, no matter how well-intentioned, can decide how hundreds of millions of people will live, we face another paradox. The very act of giving away billions reinforces the inequality it claims to fight.

    We still live in a world where the fate of the poor depends on the choices of the ultra-rich. This is not justice — it is benevolence within the boundaries of a system that demands inequality to exist. Charity may soften the edges, but it leaves the structure untouched.

    The Scarcity Trap

    As mentioned above, there is the deeper truth of money itself: it only has value when it is scarce. History shows us what happens when everyone suddenly has “enough.”

    In Weimar Germany in 1923, and again in Zimbabwe in the 2000s, governments flooded their economies with banknotes. Very quickly, everyone had them — bundles, wheelbarrows, even trillions of dollars in salaries. But prices rose just as fast, until the money became worthless.

    Or take a thought experiment: tomorrow, every person on Earth receives ten million dollars. At first it feels like paradise, right? — no one is poor, no one needs to struggle. But within days, no one will grow food, clean streets, or drive buses. Why would they? Prices for essentials skyrocket, demand outstrips supply, and within weeks the “universal millionaire” dream collapses. The currency itself becomes meaningless, and people return to barter or invent a new token of scarcity.

    The logic is unavoidable: money only has value when NOT everyone has it. Its purchasing power depends on someone else not having it. If everyone did, it would be impossible to buy or sell anything at all.

    This is why poverty never disappears in a money-based system. It isn’t a flaw to be fixed with more philanthropy. It is the very mechanism that keeps the system alive.

    Treating Symptoms, Not the Cause

    So while philanthropy can ease suffering, it cannot cure the disease. It can treat symptoms, but it cannot touch the root. More billions will not change the fact that the monetary system itself depends on exclusion, competition, and scarcity. And we are talking about THE MONETARY SYSTEM here, not capitalism, socialism or any other -ism. As long as the basis is money it will always be like this.

    A Glimpse Beyond Money

    And this is where fiction becomes a mirror.

    In the novel Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity, Benjamin Michaels opens his eyes in a world one hundred years in the future. He expects the familiar battles of wealth and survival. Instead, he finds something shocking: money itself is gone.

    The Human Shock of Abundance

    At first, his instincts betray him. He looks for a wallet, wonders who is profiting, suspects that someone must be in control. But slowly, the reality dawns: the old logic is gone. Here, life is organized not by money but by access, collaboration, and care.

    Two Paths Forward

    And so the real question emerges: if this world is possible in fiction, why not in reality?

    Bill Gates believes more money can save the world. But what if the opposite is true? What if the world can only be saved when money itself is no longer the measure of value?

    Philanthropy looks noble, but it is still locked inside the paradigm that created the problems. Ben’s awakening suggests another path: one where humanity organizes around need, not profit; where innovation is driven by curiosity, not patents; where survival is a birthright, not a market exchange.

    The Choice Before Us

    Imagine if even a fraction of Gates’ billions were not used to patch up the old system, but to prototype the new — communities, technologies, and models of living that no longer depend on money at all. The change would not just be charitable; it would be transformational.

    So we return to the question: can more money save the world? Or will we only truly wake up when we dare to imagine a future beyond money itself? If you want to experience a world of abundance without money I invite you to read the book:

    ORDER THE BOOK HERE

  • Starving at the Banquet: Why a Moneyless World Makes More Sense

    Starving at the Banquet: Why a Moneyless World Makes More Sense

    💸 Today’s Monetary Myth

    Today we have the most advanced and complex monetary system in the history of mankind. Global markets run on lightning-fast digital transactions. Central banks manipulate economies with a few keystrokes. And most people—governments included—believe that money is as essential as air.

    Money is debt

    We often think of money as wealth—but in reality, money is debt. Nearly every dollar, euro, or yen in circulation was created as a loan, to be paid back with interest. Institutions like the World Bank and IMF lend vast sums to poorer nations, expecting repayment in a currency they don’t control—plus interest. But here’s the catch: if all debt were repaid, there would be no money left. The system demands endless borrowing just to stay afloat. It’s not just flawed—it’s structurally insane. Absurdity without limits.

    We can’t live without it, they say.

    We need it for everything:

    • To buy food, water, shelter.
    • To travel, learn, communicate.
    • To build roads, fund hospitals, fix schools.

    If our lives aren’t good, we blame a lack of money.
    If governments fall short, we say they’re out of money.

    But is that really true? Will more money actually help?

    Has humanity always been dependent on money?

    Let’s dig deeper.

    🌿 The Origins of Money: Barter or Gifting?

    We’ve all heard the story: that money evolved from barter. That people once swapped chickens for carrots and apples for arrows, until someone invented money to make things easier.

    But that story is a myth.

    Anthropologists have found little evidence that barter was ever the dominant system in early human communities. Instead, many societies operated on gift economies—systems based on mutual aid, trust, and social bonds. People shared what they had, not because they expected direct trade, but because the survival of the group depended on it.

    Barter likely emerged later, in fringe interactions between strangers. But money didn’t evolve because it was natural. It arose because it was useful for control—as agriculture created surplus and hierarchies, rulers needed a way to tax, store, and regulate that surplus. Thus, money became a tool of power, not just convenience.

    🏛 From Gifting to Control

    As human societies grew, so did the complexity of exchange. Early forms of money—cattle, grain, shells—were gradually replaced by precious metals, then paper notes backed by gold, and finally, abstract digital numbers backed by nothing but belief. And that is all it is.

    Belief.

    If people stop believing money or stocks have value, the value will vanish instantly. We see it in the stock market every day. That is why the value of stocks go up and down and currencies fluctuate.

    At first, money facilitated trade. Over time, it became a mechanism for hoarding and controlling resources. The more abstract it became, the more power it gave to those who controlled its flow.

    Money stopped being a tool and became the gatekeeper of life.

    💣 The Paradox of Money: Too Much, and It Breaks

    Here’s the uncomfortable truth:

    If there’s enough money for everyone to get what they need, the system collapses.

    Why? Because the system is built on artificial scarcity. Too much money in the system makes money loose its value. That’s why it must be kept scarce for the common man. If everyone had enough, they’d stop tolerating soul-crushing jobs. Prices would surge, inflation would rise, and the economy would “overheat.” In other words: it only “works” if most people never get enough.

    The system isn’t broken.
    It’s functioning exactly as designed.

    💰 Scarcity in the Age of Abundance

    Today, we live in a world of technological abundance:

    • Automation can replace repetitive labor.
    • Renewable energy can power the planet.
    • Communication tools connect billions.
    • We produce enough food to feed everyone and more.

    And yet…

    • Food is wasted while people starve.
    • Homes sit empty while people sleep outside.
    • Clean tech is stalled to protect profits.
    • People work meaningless jobs just to survive.

    It’s as if we’re starving while guarding a pile of food stamps, arguing over who should get how many—while the banquet behind us is rotting.

    🧾 The Tax Illusion: Fairness in a Rigged Game

    People think we can get a just world by dividing money better, but that is impossible as money only have value if it is scarce. If everybody had enough money it would have no value…

    Some argue, “We don’t need to get rid of money—just tax the rich!”

    But look closer:

    • Jeff Bezos spends £34 million on a wedding.
    • Amazon UK pays £0 in taxes in 2022.

    That’s not a glitch. That’s the design.

    The rich don’t evade taxes—they avoid them legally, using laws crafted by the very lobbyists they fund. And even if they did pay more, what then?

    We’d still be:

    • Tying basic needs to income.
    • Valuing GDP over human well-being.
    • Accepting poverty as normal.
    • Overshoot our natural resources.

    Taxes just move tokens around in a broken game. The problem isn’t who pays—it’s that we’re still playing the game of scarcity when the Earth already provides an abundance for all.

    🤯 Rethinking the Whole Question

    We ask, “How will we pay for universal healthcare, housing, or education?”

    But maybe we’re asking the wrong question.

    Instead, ask:

    • Do we have the resources?
    • Can they be utilized at noe one else’s expense?
    • Do we have the technology?
    • Do we have the will?

    If the answer is yes, cost becomes irrelevant. We don’t need permission from money—we need to organize wisely, optimize and share.

    🌍 A Moneyless World: Not Utopia—Just Sense

    Let’s be clear: this isn’t about going back to the stone age and barter. It’s about evolution. Move into a just and sane future together.

    A moneyless world isn’t a fantasy. It’s a system where:

    • Resources are accessed by need, not price.
    • Collaboration replaces competition.
    • Well-being for all, not profit, becomes the goal.

    And it’s already emerging:

    • Open-source communities.
    • Gift economies.
    • Peer-to-peer sharing.
    • The dream of Resource-Based Economies.

    The shift starts with one question:

    Why are we still doing this to ourselves?

    Final Thought

    Money is not air.
    It’s not food.
    It’s not shelter.

    It is a manmade invention.

    A symbol. A belief. A story we tell.

    But maybe it’s time to tell a new story—
    one where no one starves at a banquet of abundance.

    If this resonates with you—if you’ve ever questioned the system we live by—then Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity might just be the novel you didn’t know you needed. It follows Benjamin Michaels, once a multi-billionaire and master of the old world, who suddenly wakes up in a future where money no longer exists. Ownership is gone. Profit is irrelevant. Scarcity has been replaced by intelligent sharing and stewardship of the Earth.

    At first, he’s more than confused—he’s shaken to the core. Everything that once defined his worth, his power, his identity… has vanished. And yet, the world he finds is peaceful, abundant, and profoundly human.

    Ben’s journey mirrors our own potential transformation: What happens when we let go of the old story—and begin to trust that there really is enough for all?

    ORDER THE BOOK HERE