Tag: better future

  • Beyond Ownership: Why AI Will Render the Concept of Ownership Obsolete

    Beyond Ownership: Why AI Will Render the Concept of Ownership Obsolete

    When tech leaders and titans of high finance debate the future of artificial intelligence, they inevitably reach the same tantalizing conclusion: intelligent automation and robotics will soon unleash an era of unprecedented global expansion. In this near-future world, the cost of producing goods, energy, and services drops toward zero.

    Yet during a high-profile exchange at the World Economic Forum in Davos between Elon Musk and Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, a critical fault line emerged. While Musk pointed to exponential productivity as the solution to global poverty, Fink zeroed in on the structural question mainstream visionaries routinely gloss over:

    Larry Fink: 

    “Elon, can that expansion be broad? Or is it narrow? And how can that be created? How can it broaden the global economy?”

    When asked directly how it broadens the economy, Musk answered that economic output will scale exponentially with robotic labor:

    “The way to think of it is that if you have a large number of humanoid robots, the economic output is the average productivity per robot times the number of robots.”

    He argued that in a benign scenario, automated production will eventually saturate all human material needs to the point where people won’t even be able to think of new tasks to ask a robot to perform.

    But Fink’s point strikes at the very foundation of our economic system, wondering if this expansion will benefit everyone or just a few. If automated systems become the sole engine of wealth creation, who actually owns the engine? A few hyper billionaires, or humanity as a whole?

    The Flaw in the Market Solution

    Musk’s answer to Fink’s concern relies on traditional market dynamics: scale, open-source competition, and plummeting marginal costs. In Musk’s view, because tech companies naturally seek the largest possible customer base, market competition will force AI and robotics out to billions of people, making abundance broad by sheer volume.

    However, this logic contains a massive blind spot.

    Lowering the cost of production does not solve the fundamental problem of access if the underlying mechanisms of income, capital, and private title remain unchanged. If a tiny fraction of corporate entities and private individuals own the algorithms, data centers, energy grids, and robotic factories, then even hyper-cheap abundance remains bottled up behind a legal gatekeeper.

    Traditional market thinking tries to patch this hole with ideas like Universal Basic Income (UBI) or Universal High Income(UHI). But these are merely temporary band-aids—scaffolding designed to pump financial purchasing power into the hands of consumers so they can continue buying goods from capital owners and thus pump the financial power back to the capital owners. It attempts to maintain the illusion of a market exchange long after the necessity of human labor in production has evaporated.

    Furthermore, these universal income models assume a tax base that is rapidly disappearing. In our current framework, state tax revenue relies completely on citizens—through income taxes, payroll taxes, and wage-driven consumer spending. But if AI and robotics displace human labor at scale, the primary engine of public revenue dries up. Where does the state draw the funds to distribute a UBI or UHI if the taxable working class no longer exists? Proponents point to “robot taxes” or corporate AI levies, but this creates an absurd circular loop: taxing corporate capital to fund state payouts, so citizens can hand that money right back to the corporate capital owners. The logic completely falls apart. The only true resolution is to stop trying to patch a broken loop and instead replace the monetary system itself, making the shift from ownership to stewardship our main foundational change.

    If we want true, broad abundance, we cannot simply adjust the distribution of money. We have to fundamentally rethink the concept of ownership itself.

    From passive Ownership to Active Stewardship

    Our current economic framework is anchored in private property rights—a system designed to manage artificial scarcity by granting an owner the legal right to exclude others, extract rent, and maximize short-term capital returns.

    When applied to an automated world, exclusive ownership becomes an even tighter artificial bottleneck that enforces artificial scarcity.

    Crucially, our economy is fundamentally powered by human activity, not machines. The entire monetary engine—from taking out and repaying loans to paying taxes, settling monthly bills, and earning wages—relies on billions of people earning an income to cycle capital back through the system. If intelligent automation and robotics displace human labor at scale, the conventional flow of money collapses; without workers earning, there are no consumers spending or taxpayers funding public infrastructure. The rise of AI does not just present a disruption to jobs—it forces an inescapable reality upon us: when human labor is no longer the foundational fuel of production, the entire monetary system breaks down, compelling us to fundamentally rethink the necessity of money, trading, and ownership itself. Thus, UBI/UHI would not last very long or be much of a point at all as soon as the technology has come far enough. 

    To bridge the gap between technological capacity and universal human flourishing, society must transition from a paradigm of Ownership to a paradigm of Stewardship.

    1. Access Over Exclusion

    Under stewardship, the goal of economic infrastructure is not asset appreciation, but functional access. When AI and automated systems manage agricultural yield, energy lproduction, and goods manufacturing, the legal right to “own” the production capacity becomes redundant. Assets are treated as shared public infrastructure—much like the air we breathe or open-source protocols—where access is granted based on need and utility rather than account balances.

    2. Sustainable Abundance with Ecological Limits

    The word “abundance” on its own can imply reckless, endless consumption. Coupling it with sustainability requires stewardship. Private ownership incentivizes the rapid liquidation of natural capital because balance sheets do not account for planetary depletion. Stewardship bakes ecological boundaries directly into the system, using AI non-monetary to monitor resource pools, closed-loop recycling, and carrying capacities in real time.

    3. Dissolving the Gatekeeper Class

    So long as capital accumulation dictates who survives, technological advancement will run the risk of creating an ever-narrower elite. Replacing ownership with stewardship removes the leverage of the gatekeeper class. No one own anything. We all optimize and share everything based on need. When production assets are managed as a trust for all humanity, technology stops being a mechanism for extracting wealth and becomes what it was always meant to be: a tool for human liberation.

    The Horizon Beyond Money

    The debate between Larry Fink and Elon Musk reveals that even the highest tiers of global finance and technology recognize that a massive transition is underway. Yet they remain bound by the language of the old world—debating how market mechanisms or asset portfolios will adjust.

    True sustainable abundance is not just about producing more stuff faster with robots. It is about outgrowing the archaic game of tokenized exchange altogether.

    By shifting our foundational logic from who owns the world to how we responsibly steward our shared resources, we pave the way for a true post-scarcity future—a world where technology serves human purpose rather than financial accounting.

    Beyond the Paradigm of Ownership

    It is crucial to recognize that transitioning from ownership to stewardship is not a push to revive 20th-century state-collectivism or government control. Replacing private ownership with state ownership merely transfers exclusive authority from a corporate board or private individual to a bureaucratic government. Both models operate on the exact same underlying logic: the assumption that someone—an individual, a company, or a state—must possess the Earth and dictate access.

    Transcending Ownership

    Stewardship transcends the concept of ownership altogether. In nature, no forest owns the rain, and no river issues an invoice for its water; ecosystems operate through open, interconnected relationships rather than title deeds. Transforming our mindset means recognizing that humans are not masters or owners of the planet, but temporary caretakers.

    When we step away from “mine versus state-owned” and move toward stewardship, access is no longer mediated by legal title or purchasing power. Instead, societal assets, technological infrastructure, and natural resources exist to be maintained, optimized, and shared directly for human well-being and ecological health. It is not a shift in who owns the property—it is the maturation of human consciousness past the need to own at all.

    Operationalizing Stewardship: How Non-Monetary Resource Management Works

    If money is no longer used as a proxy for access, and state bureaucratic allocation is rejected, how does a society actually coordinate the flow of goods, energy, and raw materials?

    In a stewardship model, non-monetary resource management replaces speculative market pricing with real-time physical feedback loops and dynamic allocation protocols.

    1. Direct Physical Feedback Over Price Signals

    Under traditional economics, price is an indirect, highly distorted signal that measures purchasing power rather than actual human need or environmental health. In a non-monetary stewardship framework, interconnected sensor and AI networks track direct physical parameters—crop yields, regional water tables, energy grid storage, material depletion, human input and atmospheric boundaries—in real time. Supply chains shift from chasing financial profit margins to maintaining biological and operational equilibrium.

    2. Algorithmic Commons and Universal Access

    Instead of purchasing goods through monetary debt or tokenized exchanges, access is coordinated via an open algorithmic commons. Essential foundations of human welfare—clean energy, nutritious food, shelter, healthcare, and educational tools—are provisioned unconditionally as public infrastructure. When physical constraints arise for localized or rare resources (such as prime physical locations or unique craftsmanship), allocation is governed by transparent scheduling, shared usage cycles, or community-agreed priority frameworks rather than financial bidding wars.

    3. Thermodynamic and Ecological Accounting

    Monetary balance sheets record financial growth while treating environmental destruction as an “externalities” line item. Non-monetary resource management relies on strict physical accounting: tracking energy efficiency, material recyclability, and ecological carrying capacity. Automated manufacturing systems are programmed to execute projects only when raw materials can be sourced, used, and recycled within planetary boundaries.

    4. Polycentric, Transparent Governance

    To prevent automated networks or administrative boards from becoming centralized gatekeepers, governance is structured polycentrically. Local communities retain direct democratic authority over their immediate environments and social priorities, while open-source, auditable protocols coordinate larger-scale logistical distribution across regions.

    By grounding economic coordination in tangible physical reality rather than symbolic monetary exchange, non-monetary stewardship replaces structural scarcity with a system designed for real sustainable abundance.

    Experience the Future Beyond Money

    If you want to explore what this transformation looks like in practice, the novel Waking Up: A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity paints a vivid picture of a world where ownership, money, and trade have truly become relics of the past. Seen through the eyes of Benjamin Michaels—a bewildered billionaire who wakes up into this post-scarcity reality—the story allows readers to experience the daily life, culture, and human dynamics of a society grounded entirely in stewardship and abundance. The book is not a manifesto or instruction manual. Rather, it is a story meant to inspire and show what can be possible in a future like this. For Benjamin, waking up after 100 years in cryonic preservation is of course a shock. But what will he experience in this new world? 

    Will he survive? Will he thrive? Or will he succumb to the temptation of another wake-up trying to bring the world back to what it was…? Back to money, war and ownership…?

    Discover his story 

  • Just for the love of it

    Just for the love of it

    A friend of mine in Norway runs a small music blog called Volum11.no

    No Corporate Backing

    The name itself is a little music joke. It comes from the rockumentary film This Is Spinal Tap, where one of the musicians proudly points to his amplifier and says, “This one goes to 11.” It’s exactly the kind of reference only a true music enthusiast would choose.

    He has no sponsors. No corporate backing. No business plan.

    He simply listens and writes.

    He writes about old albums, new albums, forgotten artists and modern classics. He dissects production techniques, musicianship, lyrics and atmosphere. But he also digs into the lives of the artists themselves—their childhoods, the bands they formed, the musicians they collaborated with, are influenced of and the creative journeys that shaped their music.

    Reading his articles feels less like reading reviews and more like traveling through music history.

    And he does it simply because he loves music.

    Not because anyone told him to.
    Not because the government assigned him to do it.
    Not because there is huge money in it.

    But simply because he loves it.

    Reading his articles feels less like reading reviews and more like traveling through music history.

    Why Work?

    This made me think of a chapter I recently read in Robin Everett Cox’s excellent book What Comes Next? Volume 1: The Illusion of Money: Why We Need a “System Upgrade”.

    The chapter is called “Why Work?”, and it asks one of the most fundamental questions of all.

    Why do we work?

    Many would say, “because we need money”. And that wouldn’t be wrong of course. In the context we are in.

    But Robin points to the remarkable response during the COVID-19 pandemic in England, when millions of people volunteered to help total strangers without expecting anything in return. According to Patrick Butler, writing in The Guardian:

    “In the space of a few weeks of corona virus lockdown England acquired a million-strong network of social volunteers – surpassing demand and prompting speculation: is this a new sign of social solidarity, and can the newly acquired community spirit survive?”

    Robin then writes:

    “It is inherent to volunteering that volunteers don’t receive payment for their time. As author Sherry Anderson said, ‘Volunteers don’t get paid, not because they’re worthless, but because they’re priceless.’ Putting a price tag on their labour not only negates their status as volunteers; some studies suggest that, when offered a financial reward, they are inclined to work less and with markedly less enthusiasm.

    In short, money can undermine our ‘intrinsic motivation’ to work.”

    — Robin Everett Cox, What Comes Next? Volume 1: The Illusion of Money

    That paragraph stayed with me.

    Our Intrinsic Motivation

    “money can undermine our ‘intrinsic motivation’ to work.”

    Really?

    If so, perhaps we’ve been asking ourselves the wrong question for centuries.

    We’ve built an entire civilization around the assumption that money is what motivates people.

    Without money, people wouldn’t work.

    Without salaries, nobody would contribute.

    Without financial incentives, civilization would collapse.

    But is that really true?

    Volunteers Helping Strangers

    When I look around, I don’t see a world driven only by money. Of course, I see people work for money, but that is only because we live within a monetary system that demands money for almost everything. But if there wasn’t any money in the first place, I think we would still work just as much. But for different reasons. Even in today’s world I see lots of work being done for reasons other than money.

    I see volunteers helping strangers.

    I see parents dedicating countless unpaid hours to raising children.

    I see programmers building free open-source software that powers much of the internet.

    I see people contributing to Wikipedia.

    I see neighbors helping neighbors after floods, fires and earthquakes.

    I see people restoring old cars simply because they love them.

    I see gardeners spending weekends growing flowers and vegetables.

    I see musicians playing, improvising and composing music.

    Artists painting.

    Writers writing.

    Dancers dancing.

    And then I look at the work people actually get paid to do.

    The Salary is Not the Dream

    Many farmers don’t become farmers because they’re chasing wealth. They genuinely love farming. They love being outdoors, working with the seasons and watching life grow from the soil.

    Many builders love construction. They enjoy seeing something tangible rise from an empty plot of land. Something useful. Something needed.

    Many teachers love watching children discover something new.

    Many nurses love caring for people.

    Many security guards and police officers genuinely enjoy being of service and helping others feel safe.

    Many engineers love solving problems.

    Many scientists love discovering how the world works.

    Many chefs love cooking.

    For countless people, the salary is not the dream.

    It is simply what allows them to continue doing what they already love.

    Of course, not everyone has their dream job. Many people work in jobs they would happily leave tomorrow if they could.

    But perhaps that, too, tells us something.

    Whenever people have the opportunity, they usually try to move closer to what genuinely interests them.

    They change careers.

    Start businesses.

    Study new subjects.

    Write books.

    Learn instruments.

    Travel.

    Volunteer.

    Create.

    Because something inside them keeps pulling them toward meaning.

    Toward curiosity.

    Toward contribution.

    Toward joy.

    Maybe that’s what it really means to be human.

    Maybe we are not naturally lazy beings who must constantly be bribed into contributing.

    Maybe we are naturally curious beings who want to create, build, care, discover and share.

    If that’s true, then perhaps the real purpose of a civilization should not be to figure out how to coerce people to work.

    Perhaps it should be to make it as easy as possible for people to do what they genuinely love.

    But no, no. We have to buy, sell, compete, extract, consume, argue, earn money, go to war, hoard more, stress more, go bankrupt, start all over again and constantly tricking each other into buying as much as physically possible. 

    Imagine what humanity might become if that was not our starting point.

    But rather: A civilization where people aren’t asking:

    “How can I make a living?”

    But instead:

    “How can I best contribute?”

    Maybe that’s not an impossible dream.

    Maybe we already see glimpses of it every single day.

    In volunteers.

    In artists.

    In teachers.

    In farmers.

    In builders.

    In musicians.

    Reward

    There is another assumption buried deeply within our economic thinking: that human beings need to receive something from somebody else in return for everything they do. A reciprocal service.

    Money.

    A favour.

    A product.

    A service.

    Some kind of trade.

    Otherwise, why bother?

    But perhaps the answer is staring us in the face.

    The reward can be in the task itself.

    The musician doesn’t necessarily need somebody to reward her for playing music. Playing music is the reward.

    The gardener doesn’t need somebody to compensate him for tending his garden. Watching it grow and enjoying the fresh air and nature can be the reward in itself.

    The farmer can experience enormous satisfaction from seeing the first shoots emerge from the soil.

    The builder can stand back at the end of the day and look at something that didn’t exist before.

    And my friend doesn’t spend hours researching the history of musicians and writing articles for Volum 11 because he expects somebody to give him something of equivalent value in return.

    He enjoys doing it.

    The reward lies in doing what you love.

    There can also be another kind of reward—one that doesn’t require a direct exchange.

    Think again about those volunteers in England. They weren’t thinking, I’ll help this particular person today as long as this particular person promises to repay me tomorrow.

    There was no contract.

    No invoice.

    No balance sheet.

    Perhaps many simply understood something much more fundamental:

    We all benefit from living in a society where people help one another.

    I contribute when I can. Someone else contributes when they can. And when I eventually need help, likely somebody will be there for me too.

    Nobody has to keep score.

    That isn’t really trade at all.

    It is participation in a society in which people contribute because they care about what they are doing—and about each other.

    GROJ

    This is an idea I played with in my novel Waking Up.

    In the future civilization Benjamin Michaels awakens to, money has disappeared. But the people jokingly say they still have a “currency”.

    They call it GROJ: Gratitude, Love, Joy.

    It is a rather peculiar currency.

    You can’t put it in a bank.

    You can’t hoard it.

    You can’t accumulate enough of it to become a billionaire.

    In fact, GROJ works almost exactly opposite to money.

    The more you give away, the more you get.

    Help somebody, and you may receive gratitude while experiencing the joy of having helped.

    Create something beautiful and share it, and that joy can spread to other people and come back to you in addition to the joy you felt when creating it.

    Give love, and you may find yourself surrounded by more of it.

    Nobody needs to keep score.

    Maybe this is the kind of reward we have underestimated.

    Not everything valuable needs to come back to us as payment or ROI.

    Sometimes doing it is the reward.

    Sometimes giving it away is the reward.

    And sometimes the richest person in the room might simply be the one experiencing the most gratitude, love and joy.

    In people like my friend in Norway, quietly writing article after article about music…

    Just for the love of it.

    A World Like That

    What if we actually had a world like that? Where everyone only did what they genuinely loved doing?

    In the novel Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity, the bewildered billionaire Benjamin Michaels wakes up in a world exactly like that. And through his eyes you can get a glimpse into that world too.

    Discover his story

    Further reading:

    Robin Everett Cox – What Comes Next? Volume 1: The Illusion of Money: Why We Need a “System Upgrade”

    Volum11 – https://www.volum11.no

    Harald Neslein Sandø – Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity

  • Is Life Over for Humanity?

    Is Life Over for Humanity?

    Yesterday I came across another news report.

    Europe’s waterways are at record-low levels.

    The Rhine and the Danube—two of Europe’s most important rivers—have become so shallow that cargo ships can no longer sail fully loaded. Even nuclear power plants are being affected because low water levels interfere with their cooling systems.

    Tomorrow it will probably be another headline.

    A glacier disappearing.

    The north pole ice is already gone.

    Another record-breaking heatwave.

    Another drought.

    Another forestfire.

    Another flood.

    Whether climate change is entirely human-made or not is, in one sense, beside the point.

    What matters is that something fundamental seems to be changing.

    For centuries, humanity has lived on an extraordinarily friendly planet. Rivers carried our goods. Fertile soils produced abundant food. Glaciers stored fresh water. Stable seasons allowed civilizations to flourish.

    Nature quietly made our civilization possible.

    Now the conditions that supported us for so long are becoming less predictable.

    Earth Emergency

    Does this mean life is over for humanity?

    Not necessarily.

    But it does mean we have entered a new reality.

    For most of human history, our greatest challenges were each other.

    From survival with each other on the planet to:

    Empires.

    Wars.

    Borders.

    Politics.

    Economics.

    But today, a new challenge stands above them all:

    The condition of the very planet that makes civilization possible.

    If the rivers continue drying up…

    If agriculture becomes increasingly unstable…

    If ecosystems continue breaking down…

    …then every other problem becomes harder to solve.

    This is no longer just another political issue.

    It is becoming the foundation beneath every political issue.

    And that makes it something entirely different.

    A planetary emergency.

    Fighting Each Other

    Yet look at how we respond.

    We continue acting as though the greatest threat is one another.

    We argue over political parties.

    We blame other countries.

    We compete economically.

    We prepare for wars and go through with them.

    We still seem to believe that if only our side wins, everything will somehow be fine.

    But rivers do not recognize borders.

    The atmosphere does not vote.

    The oceans do not distinguish between left and right.

    Nature has never accepted our illusion of separation.

    What We Normally Do In Emergencies

    Imagine a forest fire racing toward a town.

    Do the firefighters stop to debate politics?

    Do they argue over religion?

    Do they refuse help because it comes from another country?

    Of course not.

    They gather every available person, every vehicle and every resource.

    They work together because the emergency is greater than their disagreements.

    That is what intelligent beings do.

    So why should a planetary emergency be any different?

    History Says It Isn’t Impossible

    Some people will say humanity could never unite.

    History disagrees.

    Few believed the Soviet Union would open itself through Glasnost.

    Few imagined apartheid could end with forgiveness instead of endless revenge.

    Few expected Britain to leave India after centuries of colonial rule.

    History is full of moments that looked impossible…

    …until they happened.

    Not because humanity became perfect.

    But because enough people finally realized that continuing the old way was no longer an option.

    The Hard Question

    So perhaps the question is not whether humanity can survive.

    Perhaps the question is whether our system is designed to deal with a planetary emergency.

    For thousands of years we have built civilization on the system of ownership.

    On money.

    On trade.

    On competition.

    On the pursuit of endless economic growth.

    Those foundations have brought us extraordinary technological progress.

    But have they also encouraged us to treat the planet as something to care for rather than something to exploit?

    If our civilization rewards extracting more, consuming more and competing more, should we really be surprised that the living systems supporting all of us are beginning to struggle?

    Perhaps this is why solving one environmental problem after another never seems enough.

    We are trying to repair the roof while the foundations remain unchanged.

    What About Overpopulation?

    Whenever humanity’s environmental problems are discussed, someone always arrives at the same conclusion.

    “There are simply too many of us.”

    It is true that population matters. No planet can support unlimited growth forever, and we should aim for a stable global population over time.

    But when people talk about rapidly reducing the population, the images that come to mind are not ones I want to think about.

    History has already shown us where that kind of thinking can lead.

    No.

    If we are going to do something drastic, let it be this:

    Let’s drastically redesign the way civilization operates.

    Instead of reducing people, let’s reduce waste.

    Instead of reducing people, let’s reduce pollution.

    Instead of reducing people, let’s reduce the unnecessary consumption of resources.

    Instead of asking how to make humanity smaller, perhaps we should ask how to make humanity wiser.

    Our economic system was established in an age when the planet seemed vast and its resources almost limitless. Today we know better.

    So perhaps the emergency is not that there are eight or nine or ten billion people alive.

    Perhaps the emergency is that billions of people are participating in a civilization that rewards ever-increasing extraction, consumption and economic growth on a planet with clear physical limits.

    That is a systemic design problem.

    And unlike population, a system can be changed. And population will change with it.

    If we have the courage to face reality, the most humane response to our crisis is not to cull humanity.

    It is to redesign civilization so that humanity—and the living world we depend on—can thrive together for generations to come.

    A Civilizational Transition

    This is why I don’t believe another election will solve our problems.

    Nor another war.

    Nor another economic package.

    This is not primarily a political or economic crisis.

    It is a civilizational one.

    The solution is not for one nation to defeat another.

    Nor for one ideology to defeat another.

    The solution is for humanity to begin acting as humanity.

    To recognize that we share one planet, one biosphere and one future.

    To gather our knowledge, technology, resources and compassion—not to compete against one another, but to preserve the extraordinary world that has given us life for so long.

    Because if history has taught us anything, it is that impossible changes sometimes become inevitable.

    Imagine That Future

    This is exactly what has happened in the novel, Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity.

    Humanity has redesigned the whole system from one on endless monetary growth to to a system that supports nature and humanity forever.

    Not by becoming perfect.

    But by growing up.

    By leaving behind the illusion of separation and building a civilization designed to work for everyone—and for the planet that makes every human life possible.

    Perhaps that future begins the same way every great change in history has begun.

    With enough people daring to imagine it.

    The bewildered billionaire Benjamin Michaels wakes up one hundred years into the future expecting to expand his empire.

    Instead, he discovers that humanity finally recognized the emergency and done something about it.

    Are you curious of how the world he wakes up in looks?

    If so, you can discover his story here.

    If you believe there is still hope for humanity and think our future depends on as many as possible waking up to the possibility of a world that works for all I invite you to share this article. I thank you.

  •  Nothing Matters More Than Money

     Nothing Matters More Than Money

    Nothing matters more than money.

    Not forests.

    Not clean rivers.

    Not fertile soil.

    Not a stable climate.

    Not peace.

    Not equality.

    Not even the future.

    At least not if you judge civilization by what it consistently rewards.

    Business as usual

    The world carries on as usual.

    Investing. Expanding. Trading. Discussing interest rates, inflation, wages, savings and loans as if this way of organizing civilization is simply how the world works—and always will.

    On the surface, everything appears normal.

    Markets rise and fall. Companies are worth trillions. Governments celebrate economic growth. Economists debate the next quarter. Investors search for the next opportunity. Smartphone companies create their next smartphone.

    Business as usual.

    Shiny Surfaces

    But look beneath the money. Beneath the shiny surfaces of Apple, Samsung, Morgan Chase and Citibank. 

    Climate change.

    Environmental degradation.

    Deforestation.

    Soil erosion.

    Polluted rivers and oceans.

    Mass extinction.

    War.

    Poverty.

    Crime.

    Stress.

    Loneliness.

    Growing inequality.

    A world on the brink of social and ecological breakdown.

    No Connection

    Yet we rarely connect these crises.

    Climate is discussed over here.

    Poverty over there.

    Crime somewhere else.

    War in another room.

    Economic growth in yet another.

    Every problem gets its own debate, its own conference, its own expert panel.

    But almost nobody asks the obvious question.

    What if they are not separate problems?

    What if they are different expressions of the same underlying system?

    Because the monetary system doesn’t ask what is best for humanity.

    It doesn’t ask what is best for nature.

    It doesn’t ask what will still work a hundred years from now. Or a thousand.

    The monetary system is designed for only one thing:

    Increase monetary wealth.

    It asks only one question:

    Can it generate more money?

    If the answer is yes, the activity is rewarded.

    If the answer is no, it struggles to survive.

    That logic doesn’t only influence corporations.

    It shapes governments.

    It shapes scientific research.

    It shapes media.

    It shapes education.

    It shapes our careers.

    It shapes our daily decisions.

    Even when we know the consequences.

    We often speak as if environmental destruction, inequality and endless consumption are unfortunate side effects of an otherwise successful civilization.

    But what if they are not side effects at all?

    What if they are exactly what a civilization built around monetary growth naturally produces?

    That would explain why every attempt to solve one problem seems to create another.

    We become more efficient, and consumption grows.

    We invent cleaner technologies, yet total resource use continues to increase.

    We promise green growth while extracting more from the Earth than ever before.

    The system keeps demanding more more more and more.

    Not because people are evil or stupid.

    Not because politicians don’t care.

    But because the system reward expansion, competition and accumulation.

    The tragedy is that we have become so accustomed to this system that we mistake it for a law of nature.

    It is not.

    It is a human invention.

    And what has been invented can be reinvented.

    The real wealth of humanity has never been money.

    It has always been fertile land.

    Clean water.

    Healthy ecosystems.

    Knowledge.

    Technology.

    Human creativity.

    Cooperation.

    Money cannot replace any of these.

    It can only assign numbers to them.

    And when the numbers become more important than the things they represent, civilization begins to consume the very foundations that keep it alive.

    Because more money does not create more resources, more fertile land, clean water and clean air. Quite the contrary. More money only makes more people compete for the same resources, effectively creating scarcity where abundance was the starting point.

    Perhaps that is where we are today.

    Not facing a climate crisis.

    Or an economic crisis.

    Or a political crisis.

    But a civilizational crisis.

    One that cannot be solved by changing governments, adjusting interest rates or creating another financial incentive.

    It requires something much deeper and groundbreaking.

    A new foundation.

    One where humanity finally organizes itself around protecting and intelligently managing real wealth instead of endlessly accumulating symbolic wealth.

    It may sound impossible as we are so ingrained in the monetary system. It may seem impossible to get out. 

    No Choice

    But what if we have no choice? What if our civilization is collapsing unless we get out of the quagmire of the monetary system? 

    Doing this demands vision. Enough people being able to imagine something else. 

    A Different World

    This is exactly what has happened in the novel Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity. Humanity woke up and started imagining a different world. A world that works for both people, nature and the planet. 

    And this is exactly the future the bewildered billionaire Benjamin Michaels wakes up to in the story.

    A world where money is no longer the operating system of civilization, because humanity has finally realized that life itself is worth more. Follow the bewildered billionaire into this world as he wakes up after 100 years of cryonic preservation trying to escape his cancer. He had planned to expand his empire, but instead he finds a thriving world without money…

    Discover the story

  • The Grocery Store

    The Grocery Store

    Imagining the new world

    This article is dedicated to Zanny Minton Beddoes, Editor-in-Chief of The Economist.

    In her recent interview with Elon Musk, she asked a simple but profound question. Musk said: “By 2036, money might not matter at all“, whereupon Zanny asked:  “But in all practical terms, what would daily life look like in a moneyless world?”

    This article is an attempt to answer that question by imagining one of the most ordinary experiences of all: going to the grocery store.

    Understandably, many people have trouble imagining a world without money.

    So let’s make it simple.

    1. Abundance

    1. Imagine that the new world does not have any less abundance than today. But rather more. Imagine that all the goods, services, tools, food, technology, homes, healthcare, transport, and everything else we genuinely need are still here and are being updated as time goes by. 

    2. Grocery store

    You walk in, and the shelves are full. There are vegetables, fruit, bread, juice, household products, and everything else people in that area normally use. Perhaps there are fewer screaming labels, fewer fake choices, and far less wasted packaging — but the products are there.

    The difference is not that the store has disappeared.

    The difference is how it works.

    3. Behind the scenes

    1. Behind the scenes, an intelligent coordination system keeps track of what is actually needed and used. If people take more tomatoes, more tomatoes are produced, transported, and restocked. If people drink more orange juice, the system notices. If demand falls, production adjusts. All of it happens automatically through AI and robotics and the people who finds working with logistics interesting and fulfilling. 

    Not through prices.

    Not through profit.

    Not through competition.

    Through real need and actual use.

    While keeping it sustainable.

    AI, robotics, logistics, farming, transportation, storage, and local production all work together to keep the store supplied. The system responds to real use, not market speculation.

    And if you prefer to grow your own food, you can do that too. Whatever surplus you get you share with your neighbors and friends and get even more friends.

    If oranges grow where you live, you can grow oranges. If you want to make your own orange juice, you can order a juicer. If you want to plant vegetable beds, you can get the tools you need. If you produce more than your household uses, you can store it, share it with neighbors, or let the system know it is available.

    Nothing mystical is required.

    The new world can look surprisingly much like the world we already know.

    There will still be grocery stores, cafés, restaurants, workshops, farms, delivery systems, homes, tools, and everyday life.

    But the foundation is different.

    No Meaningless Jobs

    Today, money decides who gets what. Ownership decides who controls what. Prices decide what people can access. And millions of people are coerced into low-paid, exhausting, often meaningless jobs simply to survive.

    In a moneyless, resource-based society, the question changes.

    Instead of asking, “Can you afford it?” we ask, “Is it needed?”

    Instead of forcing people to take any job they can get just to pay bills, we ask, “What are you naturally good at? What do you love doing? Where can your contribution bring joy, usefulness, and meaning?”

    Of course, the grocery store is only one small example.

    The same principle would apply throughout society.

    Buildings would be maintained, renovated, and gradually upgraded according to need, sustainability, safety, and environmental impact. Roads, railways, water systems, energy networks, and public spaces would continuously evolve as better solutions become available.

    Vehicles would become cleaner, safer, and more efficient over time. Production methods would also improve whenever new technologies, materials, or processes could reduce waste, lower environmental impact, or provide a better quality of life.

    Society would not stand still.

    Innovation would continue. Research would continue. Development would continue.

    The difference is that progress would no longer be driven by profit, competition, or planned obsolescence, but by a simple question:

    How can we do this better?

    Better for people.

    Better for future generations.

    And better for nature and the planet that supports us all.

    The grocery store therefore becomes more than a place of consumption.

    It becomes a simple example of a different civilization.

    A civilization where the purpose of food production is not profit, but nourishment.

    A civilization where technology is not used to displace people into poverty, but to free people from unnecessary struggle.

    A civilization where abundance is organized intelligently, responsibly, and for everyone.

    That is the shift.

    Not from grocery stores to empty shelves.

    Not from comfort to sacrifice.

    But from money-based access to need-based coordination.

    From forced labor to meaningful contribution.

    From ownership and trade to stewardship and care.

    The future may not look as strange as we think.

    It may look like walking into a grocery store, taking what you need, knowing others can do the same — and realizing that civilization has finally grown up.

    If this sounds impossible, remember that every system humanity has ever lived under was once considered impossible before it existed.

    The future begins when we dare to imagine it. 

    And perhaps that is the real challenge.

    Not building the technology.

    Not producing the resources.

    But allowing ourselves to imagine that humanity can organize itself in a completely different way. And that is exactly what I have imagined in the novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity.

    It follows the bewildered billionaire Benjamin Michaels when he wakes up after one hundred years of cryonic preservation only to to discover a world where money, ownership, and trade have become historical curiosities—and where humanity has built a civilization based on cooperation, stewardship, and abundance.

    Could such a world ever exist?

    There is only one way to find out.

    👉 Discover the story

    And please share this article if it resonates.

    I thank you.

  • The Permanent Civilization

    The Permanent Civilization

    Most great civilizations in history has been temporary.

    The Egyptians believed their civilization would endure forever. The Romans thought the same. So did countless kingdoms, empires, and nations throughout history.

    Yet most of them eventually declined, fragmented, or disappeared.

    Perhaps the most dangerous assumption we make today is that our own civilization is somehow different.

    We tend to think of modern civilization as permanent. Money and ownership has lasted for generations and seem to last forever.

    But will it?

    Our economic system depends on endless growth on a finite planet. Our political systems struggle to solve increasingly global problems. Our industries consume resources faster than nature can regenerate them. Climate change, ecological degradation, resource depletion, and geopolitical tensions all raise an uncomfortable question:

    Are we building a civilization that can last?

    Or are we simply living in the latest chapter of another temporary one?

    The First Permanent Civilization

    For the first time in history, humanity possesses something no previous civilization ever had.

    A full global view.

    We can communicate instantly across continents. We can monitor weather systems from space. We can track resources, production, transportation, and consumption in real time. Artificial intelligence is rapidly increasing our ability to understand complex systems and coordinate information.

    The technical ability to manage a global civilization is already here.

    The challenge is no longer primarily technological.

    It is human.

    The question is not whether we can coordinate.

    The question is: coordinate toward what?

    Defining Success

    Before we can create a permanent civilization, we must decide what success actually means.

    Do we want everyone to have access to food, water, shelter, healthcare, and education?

    Do we want to preserve the ecosystems that support life?

    Do we want future generations to inherit a thriving planet?

    Do we want to reduce unnecessary suffering?

    Do we want peace and cooperation to become easier than conflict and competition?

    Most people, regardless of nationality, religion, or political belief, would probably answer yes to all these questions.

    Perhaps humanity already agrees on far more than we think.

    Our disagreements often concern methods rather than goals.

    And perhaps the greatest challenge facing humanity is not a lack of technology, resources, or intelligence.

    Perhaps it is simply that we have never clearly defined what success for humanity actually looks like.

    Human Hubris

    But even if we solve our environmental and economic challenges, another question remains.

    What about us?

    History is filled with examples of civilizations that were not destroyed by a lack of resources, but by arrogance, corruption, tribalism, greed, and the concentration of power.

    The Romans had resources.

    Many empires possessed advanced technologies for their time.

    What often failed was not the physical system, but the people operating within it.

    This does not mean human beings are flawed beyond repair.

    It simply means that human beings are human.

    A permanent civilization cannot depend upon perfect people alone.

    It must be designed to remain healthy despite imperfect people.

    The goal is not to eliminate human hubris.

    The goal is to prevent hubris from gaining enough influence to threaten the entire civilization.

    Decentralized but Coordinated

    This may be one of the most important lessons humanity has yet to learn.

    Power concentrated in one ruler, one party, one corporation, one ideology, or one elite group eventually creates risks for everyone.

    The larger the concentration of power, the larger the consequences when mistakes are made.

    A permanent civilization would likely require a different approach.

    Not centralized control.

    Not chaos.

    But decentralized management combined with global coordination.

    Local communities understand local needs.

    Regions understand regional challenges.

    At the same time, humanity increasingly possesses the ability to coordinate knowledge, resources, and information globally.

    A neighborhood can make decisions about its own affairs.

    A region can manage its own resources.

    A global network can provide information about planetary systems, resource availability, ecological impacts, and long-term consequences.

    The result is neither a world government nor a collection of isolated groups.

    It becomes a living network.

    A civilization where decisions are made at the lowest practical level while knowledge is shared at the highest possible level.

    Councils Instead of Rulers

    If humanity wishes to create a civilization that lasts for centuries or millennia, we may need to move beyond the ancient model of rulers.

    The challenge is not finding the perfect king, president, emperor, billionaire, or political party.

    Humanity has spent thousands of years trying that approach.

    The challenge is designing systems that remain stable and flexible regardless of who occupies a particular position.

    One possible path is a network of councils operating at neighborhood, community, regional, national, and global levels.

    Not rulers.

    But

    Direct democracy.

    Collaborators.

    Stewards.

    Combined with transparent information systems and advanced AI capable of analyzing consequences and identifying risks, such a structure could provide continuous feedback and self-correction.

    Humans would continue to provide wisdom, creativity, compassion, and values.

    AI would provide analysis, memory, modeling, and perspective.

    Together they would create a civilization that learns rather than commands.

    The Great Awakening

    Yet no system alone can guarantee permanence. A permanent civilization ultimately requires something deeper.

    A shift in consciousness.

    Not necessarily toward a particular religion, ideology, or belief system.

    But toward a broader understanding of who we are.

    For most of history, survival encouraged us to think in terms of tribes, nations, classes, religions, and competing groups. Money, ownership and property was inherited through generations. 

    Conscious Awareness

    Perhaps the next stage of civilization requires us to think as one human family. And create a new form of inheritance. An inheritance where conscious awareness is inherited. The conscious awareness that we are one global family trying our best to survive on this planet forever.

    Not because we become identical.

    Not because we lose our individuality.

    But because we recognize our shared destiny.

    The atmosphere belongs to all of us.

    The oceans belong to all of us.

    The land belong to all of us.

    The future belongs to all of us.

    A civilization that intends to last forever must care about people it will never meet and generations not yet born.

    Self-Correction, Not Perfection

    Perhaps the secret of a permanent civilization is not perfection.

    Perfection does not exist.

    Perhaps the secret is simply self-correction.

    A civilization humble enough to admit mistakes.

    Wise enough to learn from them.

    Flexible enough to change before those mistakes become fatal.

    A civilization that never assumes it has reached the end of history.

    A civilization that understands it is always evolving.

    Because the moment a civilization believes it has become perfect, it stops learning.

    And the moment it stops learning, decline begins.

    The Balanced Civilization

    The permanent civilization may not be humanity’s most powerful civilization.

    It may be humanity’s most balanced civilization.

    A civilization where power is distributed, knowledge is shared, resources are managed intelligently, and no individual or institution can accumulate enough influence to threaten the whole.

    A civilization based on stewardship rather than ownership.

    Collaboration rather than domination.

    Long-term thinking rather than short-term gain.

    Perhaps humanity’s greatest achievement will not be artificial intelligence, fusion power, space travel, or even reaching the stars.

    Perhaps our greatest achievement will be creating the first civilization in history that can truly go on forever.

    A civilization capable of enduring not merely for centuries, but for countless generations to come.

    The Permanent Civilization.

    A civilization designed not simply to survive.

    But to thrive.

    Forever.

    ⸻

    In the novel Waking Up: A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity, humanity has just made this transition and discovered what becomes possible when we begin to see ourselves as one global family. 

    The bewildered billionaire Benjamin Michaels wakes up in this future after 100 years of cryonic sleep. He was trying to escape his cancer in 2015, and hoped to wake up again continuing the expansion of his empire. Imagine his surprise when there is no money in the world anymore…

    You can discover his whole story here if you like.

    If this vision resonates with you, please share this article. The conversation about humanity’s future belongs to all of us.

  • Ecosystem or Egosystem?

    Ecosystem or Egosystem?

    From Nature’s Balance to Human Separation

    Nature spent billions of years creating an ecosystem.

    Humanity created an egosystem.

    The Web of Life Without Ownership

    Look closely at the natural world. 

    Forests, rivers, oceans, insects, birds, bacteria, fungi, and mammals all participate in an intricate web of life. Countless species compete at times, cooperate at others, and continuously recycle the same resources over and over again. The system itself has no concept of ownership. No tree claims the sunlight alone. No river demands payment for its water. No forest builds fences around the rain.

    The Rise of the Ego

    Then came us.

    Gifted with extraordinary intelligence, imagination, and self-awareness, we also developed something else: the ego. The persistent feeling that we are separate from one another, that survival depends on securing more than everyone else. The fear of not having enough. 

    Gradually, the ecosystem became an egosystem.

    From Stewardship to Ownership

    Instead of saying, “There is enough for all of us if we care for it wisely,” we began claiming pieces of the Earth as our own. We built fences, borders, and walls. We fought over land, minerals, water, forests, and eventually even ideas.

    Ownership replaced stewardship.

    Trading replaced sharing.

    Competition replaced cooperation.

    Money became the language through which access to the Earth’s resources was decided.

    The Birth of the Monetary Mindset

    The monetary system did not emerge in a vacuum. It emerged from minds that increasingly viewed the world through separation rather than connection. Once enough people believed that “mine” mattered more than “ours,” a system built on ownership, trade, and accumulation became almost inevitable.

    Living Inside the Egosystem

    Today we still live inside that egosystem.

    We measure success by monetary wealth rather than well-being. We compete for jobs, status, and possessions while surrounded by astonishing technological and natural abundance. We have learned how to produce enough to feed billions, yet millions still go hungry because access depends more on purchasing power than on human need.

    The Ego in Action

    The ego continues to shape our world in subtle and obvious ways. Nations arm themselves not only for protection, but out of fear of losing power. Corporations prioritize profit over planetary health, extracting resources faster than ecosystems can regenerate. Individuals compare, compete, and consume, often chasing identities built on status rather than substance.

    We see it in conflicts that could have been avoided through cooperation and communication. In food wasted while others starve. In oceans filled with plastic while we continue to produce even more. In the relentless pursuit of growth, even when that growth undermines the very ecosystems that sustain life.

    A Different Question

    Nature asks a different question.

    Can the whole system continue to flourish?

    Our egosystem asks another.

    How can I get more?

    Signs of Awakening

    And yet, something is changing.

    Across the world, signs of awakening are emerging. People are beginning to question the assumptions that built the egosystem. Movements for peace, sustainability, and social justice are growing and have been doing so for decades. Communities are rediscovering cooperation, and work together to grow healthy food. Renewable energy is replacing fossil fuels more and more. Forests are being restored. Cities are being redesigned with nature in mind.

    More and more individuals are recognizing that personal well-being cannot be separated from the well-being of others, or from the health of the planet itself.

    The Great Shift

    This is the beginning of a shift.

    Not a sudden revolution, but a gradual remembering.

    A remembering that we are not separate from nature, but expressions of it.

    A remembering that true security comes not from accumulation, but from collaboration and connection.

    Returning to the Ecosystem

    Perhaps the greatest transition humanity will ever make is not from one technology to another, nor from one political ideology to another.

    It is from the egosystem back to the ecosystem.

    Not by abandoning civilization, but by bringing civilization back into harmony with the living world that made it possible in the first place.

    A New Way of Living

    When we finally understand that we are not owners of the Earth but rather temporary stewards of it, everything changes.

    In that awakening, the world begins to transform. Systems once built on competition evolve toward collaboration. Resources are managed for collective well-being rather than individual gain. Technology is guided by wisdom, not just profitability. The boundaries between “mine” and “yours” soften into a shared sense of responsibility.

    The World We Can Create

    This is the world imagined in the book Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity.

    A world where humanity has remembered its place within the greater whole.

    A world where the egosystem has given way to an ecosystem of consciousness.

    Perhaps humanity’s future depends on nothing less than this choice. Choose to continue the egosystem until we perish or choose to turn completely back to the ecosystem… 

    Follow the bewildered billionaire Benjamin Michaels when he wakes up after 100 years in cryostasis, only to find a world that has embraced the ecosystem. The egosystem he relied on of money, trading and ownership is gone. His dream of expanding his empire is shattered, but maybe a new dream is born in him…?

    Discover his story

  • Living Off the Land

    Living Off the Land

    In a traditional and survivalist context, living off the land means becoming entirely self-reliant by growing your own food, foraging, harvesting natural energy (like solar or wind), and building your own shelter. This is the traditional view. But maybe it actually means something more? Something much deeper and truly life altering for the whole of humanity?

    For countless people around the world, a quiet revolution has already begun.

    Some are buying small farms. Others are transforming ordinary backyards and frontyards into thriving food forests. Lawns are becoming vegetable gardens. Empty plots are filling with fruit trees, herbs, berries, and flowers that attract bees and butterflies instead of lawnmowers.

    Many of these people aren’t doing it to become rich.

    They’re doing it because something deep inside tells them there must be another way to live.

    One YouTuber joked that the easiest way to make friends is to grow too many tomatoes. Suddenly neighbors stop by. Conversations begin. Surplus is shared. What started as gardening quietly becomes community.

    Others have discovered unexpected benefits. Front-yard gardens reduce soil erosion. Trees provide shade for pedestrians during increasingly hot summers. Birds, insects, and pollinators return. The neighborhood itself becomes more beautiful and alive.

    None of this happens because someone is chasing profit.

    It happens because nature works through abundance.

    More Than Gardening

    At first glance, living off the land might appear to be little more than a hobby.

    In reality, it is something much more profound.

    It is a demonstration that many of our most fundamental needs can be met without passing through the monetary system at all.

    The tomatoes don’t ask for money before they grow.

    The apple tree doesn’t charge rent.

    The bees don’t send invoices for pollination.

    The soil doesn’t negotiate prices.

    Nature simply produces.

    Our role is to care for it.

    A Different Relationship

    Modern society has taught us to see almost everything through ownership.

    My land.

    My house.

    My harvest.

    My products.

    But perhaps that perspective is backwards.

    What if we really are not owners at all?

    What if we are simply temporary stewards of a tiny piece of Earth?

    A steward doesn’t exploit.

    A steward nurtures.

    A steward leaves the land healthier than it was found.

    When enough people think this way, abundance begins replacing scarcity.

    Beyond Money

    If you struggle to imagine a world without ownership, money, or trade, look at these gardens.

    They already exist.

    People exchange seeds, or give them freely when they have an abundance.

    They share knowledge freely.

    They give away excess vegetables.

    Neighbors help each other build greenhouses.

    Children learn where food actually comes from.

    Without realizing it, they are already participating in an economy based less on transactions and more on relationships.

    Not because anyone forced them.

    Because it simply feels natural.

    The Real Wealth

    The old monetary system depends on money.

    People do not.

    Nature certainly does not.

    Forests grew for hundreds of millions of years before the first coin was ever minted.

    Rivers flowed.

    Seeds sprouted.

    Life flourished.

    Money is a human invention.

    Life is not.

    The more we reconnect with the living systems that sustain us, the less dependent we become on artificial systems built around endless consumption and constant economic growth.

    A New Way Forward

    Living off the land does not mean everyone must become a farmer.

    Cities will still exist.

    Technology will continue to develop.

    Science, medicine, engineering, and countless professions will remain essential.

    But the principles behind living off the land can spread everywhere.

    Community gardens.

    Food forests.

    Edible parks.

    Fruit trees along streets.

    Rooftop gardens.

    Shared orchards.

    Regenerative agriculture.

    Every square metre returned to life becomes another step toward a healthier planet.

    From Gardens to Civilization

    Looking back, it all seemed so obvious.

    The seeds of the new world had been there all along.

    They were growing quietly in backyards, community gardens, small farms, balconies, rooftops, and food forests. Millions of people had already begun demonstrating the principle that would eventually transform civilization. They simply didn’t realize how profound it was.

    They weren’t just growing tomatoes.

    They were growing a new way of thinking.

    The tomatoes ripened.

    There were more than enough.

    A neighbor walked by.

    “You want some tomatoes?”

    “Sure!”

    “Take as many as you need. We have a surplus.”

    No negotiation.

    No invoice.

    No transaction.

    Just one human being helping another because there was more than enough for everyone.

    Humanity eventually realized that this simple interaction contained the blueprint for an entirely new civilization.

    If tomatoes could be shared because there was an abundance, why not everything else?

    Need a shovel? Here you go.

    Need building materials? Of course.

    Need a wheelchair? Certainly.

    Need a robot to help in the garden? Why not? We have plenty.

    As long as humanity had the resources, the knowledge, and the ability to produce something sustainably, it simply produced what people needed and shared it directly.

    The same philosophy that had quietly flourished in gardens expanded into neighborhoods.

    Neighborhoods inspired cities.

    Cities inspired nations.

    Eventually, the entire planet awakened to the same simple truth.

    We never actually needed money to satisfy human needs.

    Only the monetary system did.

    Once we understood that, everything changed.

    We stopped producing what generated the highest profit and started producing what created the greatest well-being.

    We stopped measuring success by accumulation and began measuring it by how much life flourished.

    We stopped exploiting the Earth as owners and began caring for it as stewards.

    Technology continued to advance faster than ever before, but now it served humanity instead of an economic machine. Artificial intelligence optimized production and distribution. Robotics handled the repetitive work. Resources were carefully monitored, restored, and shared. Ingenious inventions were spread globally instead of patented. Waste fell dramatically while abundance grew.

    For the first time in history, humanity had aligned its technology with nature instead of against it.

    We took only what we truly needed from the Earth.

    We restored what we used.

    And generation after generation started to leave the planet richer than they had found it.

    Perhaps the future was never waiting for some miraculous invention.

    Perhaps it began the moment we understood that the philosophy of living off the land was never really only about food.

    It was about learning how to live together.

    That is the journey Benjamin Michaels unexpectedly wakes up to one hundred years in the future in Waking Up – A journey towards a new dawn for humanity. A world that at first seems impossible, but that slowly reveals itself to have grown from thousands of small choices made by ordinary people—people who chose stewardship over ownership, abundance over scarcity, and sharing over endless competition.

    Perhaps the future does not begin with a revolution.

    Perhaps it begins with a single seed.

    Discover the story

  • Imagine a World…

    Imagine a World…

    Imagine a world…

    Without taxes, loans, debts, mortgages, interest payments, lawyers, insurance premiums, financial stress, inflation, recessions, unemployment, politicians, election campaigns, lobbying, corruption, inequality, homelessness, most crime, pollution, environmental destruction, deforestation, collapsing ecosystems, biodiversity loss, species extinction, depleted soils, plastic-filled oceans, fossil fuel dependency, planned obsolescence, overconsumption, food waste, resource scarcity, hunger, preventable disease, child labour, exploitation, economic insecurity, war, refugees, nuclear weapons—or  money.

    At first glance, it sounds like fantasy.

    A paradise that could never exist.

    But before dismissing the idea, let’s take another look at that first paragraph.

    So Called Life

    Every month, you work hard, only to watch a large part of your salary disappear before you have even had the chance to decide what to do with it. Then come the bills. The mortgage. The rent. The electricity. The insurance. The phone. The internet. The car. The unexpected repair. The next tax payment. Another reminder. Another deadline. Another expense.

    You finally find the home you’ve always wanted.

    The price is more than you will earn in decades.

    So you borrow.

    Not for a few months.

    Not for a few years.

    For decades.

    Thirty years of monthly payments. Thirty years of hoping life doesn’t suddenly change for the worse. Thirty years of knowing that missing enough payments could cost you the very place you call home.

    You wake up when the alarm rings.

    Not necessarily because you are inspired by the day ahead.

    But because the bills are waiting.

    The mortgage is waiting.

    The tax office is waiting.

    Life has become a long chain of financial obligations.

    For many people, stress becomes so normal that they no longer even recognize it as stress.

    They simply call it life.

    Promised Solutions

    Meanwhile, political parties promise solutions. Elections come and go. Governments change. Policies change. Yet the underlying problems somehow remain. Society continues arguing over how to manage the system instead of asking whether the system itself could be  different.

    Around us, inequality keeps growing. Some accumulate wealth beyond imagination while others struggle to afford housing, healthcare or even enough food. Entire families work full-time and still live from one payday to the next.

    At the same time, the natural world quietly pays the price.

    Ancient forests disappear.

    Wetlands are drained.

    Topsoil—the thin living skin that feeds humanity—is steadily eroded.

    Rivers are polluted.

    Oceans fill with plastic.

    Coral reefs bleach.

    Fish stocks decline.

    Insects vanish.

    Birdsong grows quieter.

    Species that evolved over millions of years disappear forever.

    The climate becomes increasingly unstable while our economic system continues demanding more production, more consumption and more growth.

    And then there is war.

    Cities reduced to rubble.

    Children growing up surrounded by explosions instead of playgrounds.

    Families fleeing with nothing but what they can carry.

    Entire generations scarred by conflicts they never chose.

    Most of us have become so accustomed to all of this that we rarely stop to ask a simple question:

    Does civilization really have to work this way?

    Because every civilization is designed. More or less.

    Every economic system is designed. More or less.

    Every institution is designed. More or less.

    And what is designed can also be redesigned.

    Every great leap in human history first existed only in someone’s imagination.

    Every bridge.

    Every airplane.

    Every computer.

    Every spacecraft.

    Someone dared to imagine something that many believed was impossible. Yet, we have gone to the moon, invented the internet, aviation, nanotechnology, wireless communication and much much more.

    So why shouldn’t we dream just as boldly for humanity itself? For our future?

    Imagine Another Kind of World

    A world with intelligently optimized management and sharing of Earth’s resources.

    A world with a system designed to create more peace, more food, more health, more joy and more prosperity than humanity has ever imagined.

    A world where homes exist to be lived in instead of traded.

    Where technology removes unnecessary work instead of threatening people’s livelihoods.

    Where food production is optimized to nourish everyone while restoring the ecosystems that sustain us.

    Where energy is clean, abundant and designed around the long-term health of the planet.

    Where science, artificial intelligence and automation continuously improve transportation, healthcare, education and manufacturing—not to maximize quarterly profits, but to maximize human and ecological well-being.

    Where stewardship replaces ownership.

    Where collaboration replaces ruthless competition.

    Where sharing replaces unnecessary trading.

    Where success is measured not by how much one person accumulates, but by how much humanity and nature flourish together.

    It sounds like an impossible dream.

    But then again…

    Nothing has ever changed until someone first imagined that it could.

    That is the invitation of Waking Up: A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity.

    Not to escape reality.

    But to imagine a civilization whose foundations are designed for something entirely different:

    Not endless accumulation.

    But lasting prosperity for all.

    Not profit above all else.

    But the flourishing of humanity and the living world together.

    The billionaire Benjamin Michaels wakes up in exactly this world after 100 years of cryonic sleep, hoping to expand his empire into the future. Imagine his surprise when he finds a world without money that works for all instead…

    Discover his story

  • The Bad Conscience of the West

    The Bad Conscience of the West

    There is a quiet discomfort that many people in the wealthier parts of the world carry with them.

    We rarely speak about it.

    Responsible Choices

    We recycle. We donate to charity. We buy organic food when we can. We choose fair-trade products. We try to make environmentally responsible choices.

    Yet many of us still have the feeling that something isn’t quite right.

    Deep down, we know that much of the prosperity we enjoy has come at a cost that others have paid.

    For centuries, the wealthiest nations built their fortunes by extracting resources, labour and wealth from other parts of the world, largely disregarding the life of the people we took it from.

    Colonialism officially belongs to history, but many of the economic structures that replaced it continue to concentrate wealth in some regions while leaving others struggling with poverty, conflict and environmental destruction.

    The minerals for our phones and computers are mined in poorer countries.

    The cotton for our clothes is grown there.

    The garments are stitched there.

    The coffee is harvested there.

    The cocoa is harvested there.

    The raw materials leave.

    The finished products arrive in our shops.

    The profits largely remain with multinational corporations and wealthy economies.

    When the Waste Comes Back

    The story doesn’t end when we have finished using those products.

    When our phones become obsolete…

    When our computers are replaced…

    When our televisions are upgraded…

    When refrigerators, washing machines and countless other products reach the end of their deliberately short lives…

    Where does much of it end up?

    Far too often, it is shipped back to poorer countries as waste.

    Discarded Electronics

    Mountains of discarded electronics stretch across the landscape.

    Men, women and children search through toxic piles of broken computers, televisions and mobile phones looking for tiny fragments of copper, aluminium or gold that might earn enough money to buy food for another day.

    Plastic insulation is burned to recover valuable metals.

    Lead, mercury and countless other toxic substances seep into the soil and water.

    Poisonous smoke fills the air.

    People sacrifice their health—and sometimes their lives—for scraps that wealthier societies no longer want.

    The same countries that supplied many of the raw materials are now asked to deal with much of the waste.

    The same pattern repeats itself elsewhere.

    Rivers are polluted by chemicals from textile production.

    Oil spills poison coastlines.

    Forests disappear to satisfy global demand.

    Communities lose clean water so others can enjoy inexpensive products.

    Children work where they should be learning.

    Families survive on wages that would be unimaginable in the countries consuming the finished goods.

    Good People in a Bad System

    None of this is an accusation against ordinary people.

    Most of us simply buy what is available in the shops. We did not create these supply chains. We did not design the monetary system that rewards the cheapest production regardless of the human or environmental cost.

    We were born into it.

    And perhaps that is why so many people feel powerless.

    We recycle.

    We donate.

    We consume a little less.

    These are good things.

    But they only soften the symptoms.

    They cannot solve a system whose primary objective is endless economic growth, continuous consumption and maximum financial return.

    As long as profit remains the overriding objective, environmental destruction, inequality and exploitation are not unfortunate accidents.

    They are predictable outcomes.

    The Three Foundations

    So why does this keep happening?

    Why do resources flow in one direction while pollution and waste often flow back in the other?

    Why do billions of people still struggle in a world that already possesses the knowledge, technology and productive capacity to provide everyone with a good life?

    I believe the answer can be traced back to three foundations of our current civilisation.

    Money.

    Trade.

    Ownership.

    Together they determine who gains access to the world’s resources—not according to human need or what benefits humanity most, but according to purchasing power, financial return and private control.

    Everything else follows naturally.

    If cutting down a rainforest is profitable, it happens.

    If producing disposable products increases sales, it happens.

    If shipping electronic waste halfway around the world is cheaper than processing it responsibly, it happens.

    The system is simply doing exactly what it was designed to do.

    A Different Foundation

    In the future world described in Waking Up, humanity has realized that these three foundations no longer served civilization.

    Instead of endlessly trying to regulate a system that continuously recreated the same problems, humanity chose a different foundation altogether.

    Money.

    Trade.

    Ownership.

    They stepped away from all three.

    Instead, humanity simply chose to optimize and share the Earth’s resources directly.

    Not through markets.

    Not through financial transactions.

    Not through competition.

    But through stewardship, collaboration and intelligent global coordination supported by artificial intelligence, robotics and sustainable technology.

    The objective of civilisation changed completely.

    No longer to maximise profit.

    But to optimise the world.

    Optimize human wellbeing.

    Optimize the use of resources.

    Optimize technology.

    Optimize agriculture.

    Optimize nature itself and our relationship with it.

    Optimize the future for generations yet to come.

    A World with Good Conscience

    Once that became humanity’s shared purpose, everything else began to change.

    Products were designed to last.

    Waste became a valuable resource instead of a problem.

    Pollution was designed out of the system rather than cleaned up afterwards.

    Communities collaborated instead of competing.

    The Earth’s abundance was managed for everyone instead of accumulated by a fortunate few.

    No country needed to become rich at another country’s expense.

    No child needed to search through toxic waste just to survive another day.

    No river needed to be poisoned for the sake of quarterly profits.

    No rainforest needed to disappear simply because it was financially profitable.

    For the first time in history, humanity could truly live with a clear conscience.

    Not because people had become poorer.

    Not because they had learned to feel guilty about living well, or become good at suppressing their conscience..

    But because they finally knew that their wellbeing no longer depended upon someone else’s suffering.

    That is the civilization imagined in the book.

    A world where humanity has finally understood that the greatest wealth on Earth is not money, trade or ownership.

    It is the planet itself.

    And our willingness to share it fairly.

    An Impossible Dream

    If this sounds like an impossible dream, you’re not alone.

    Benjamin Michaels thought exactly the same.

    In Waking Up: A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity, the former billionaire awakens after one hundred years of cryonic sleep expecting to return to the world he once knew. Instead, he finds a civilization where the monetary system have become history, replaced by a society built on sharing, stewardship and the optimization of the world for everyone.

    At first, he fights it.

    Then he questions it.

    Eventually, he begins to discover that perhaps humanity didn’t lose its civilization after all.

    Perhaps it finally found it.

    Discover the story.