Category: SPIRITUAL AWAKENING

  • The Brotherhood Of Man

    The Brotherhood Of Man

    For thousands of years, across cultures, religions, and philosophies, humanity has returned to the same simple recognition: we belong to one another.

    It has been called many things — human unity, universal kinship, fraternity, solidarity — but the essence is always the same. There is one human family. Harm to one is harm to all. Care for one strengthens the whole.

    This idea did not originate in one place. It surfaced wherever people looked deeply enough at life itself — and it has been articulated with striking clarity by thinkers who refused to separate spirituality from social reality. In India, thinkers such as Mahatma Gandhi and Swami Vivekananda articulated it with unusual clarity, extending kinship not only to all humans, but to animals and even the smallest forms of life. In Christianity, it appeared as one body with many members — echoed later by figures like Leo Tolstoy and Martin Luther King Jr., who both understood brotherhood as inseparable from justice. In Indigenous cultures, it lived as relational responsibility to land, ancestors, and future generations. In modern science, it quietly reappears as shared ancestry and ecological interdependence.

    The truth is not controversial.

    The problem is not belief.

    The problem is the system we live in.

    Brotherhood is not a moral instruction

    Most discussions of brotherhood frame it as an ethical appeal: be kind, be compassionate, treat others as equals. While well‑intentioned, this framing misses the deeper point.

    Brotherhood is not primarily about goodness.

    It is about how reality is structured.

    We are biologically, ecologically, spiritually and socially interdependent. No individual, group, or nation survives in isolation. Every action ripples outward through networks of people, resources, and ecosystems.

    When a system reflects this interdependence, cooperation emerges naturally.
    When a system denies it, conflict becomes normalized.

    And this brings us to the uncomfortable truth.

    Why true brotherhood cannot exist within the monetary system

    The modern monetary system is not neutral.

    It is built on specific assumptions:

    • Separation rather than connection
    • Competition rather than cooperation
    • Scarcity rather than abundance
    • Ownership rather than stewardship

    Within this framework, survival itself is conditional.

    Access to food, shelter, healthcare, education, and dignity is mediated by money — not by need, contribution, or shared humanity. This means that for some to feel secure, others must remain insecure. For some to win, others must lose.

    This is not a bug.

    It is a feature.

    Markets require winners and losers. Growth requires pressure. Profit requires cost‑cutting, which almost always means pushing someone — or something — down the hierarchy.

    In such a system, brotherhood becomes a slogan rather than a lived reality.

    You may love your neighbor in principle, but if the structure rewards outcompeting them, compassion is constantly overridden by necessity. Even kindness becomes conditional: charity instead of justice, aid instead of shared access.

    You cannot build genuine fraternity inside a system that:

    • monetizes survival and life itself
    • turns cooperation into a competitive advantage
    • measures human worth through productivity
    • externalizes harm to invisible others or future generations

    Brotherhood cannot flourish where fear is the organizing principle.

    Why moral preaching keeps failing

    This is why appeals to unity so often sound hollow.

    People are told to be more compassionate while living inside a system that punishes compassion. They are urged to cooperate while being ranked, priced, and evaluated against one another. They are asked to care for the planet while being trapped in economic structures that reward its destruction.

    The result is cognitive dissonance.

    We blame individuals for behaviors that are structurally enforced.

    And when brotherhood repeatedly collapses under pressure, we conclude that humans are flawed — instead of recognizing that the design is flawed.

    Brotherhood as systems design

    Spiritual traditions were never wrong.

    They were simply incomplete without structural alignment.

    A system that reflects brotherhood would:

    • guarantee access to life’s necessities as a birthright
    • treat Earth’s resources as the common inheritance of humanity
    • reward contribution rather than accumulation
    • replace competition for survival with collaboration for flourishing

    In such a system, brotherhood would no longer need to be taught.

    It would emerge naturally — just as it already does within families, close communities, and moments of crisis when money temporarily loses relevance.

    This is why the smallest functioning unit of a post‑monetary world already exists: the family.

    Families operate internally without money. Needs are met because they are needs. Contribution flows according to ability and circumstance. Trust replaces contracts. Care replaces pricing.

    The challenge has never been human nature.

    It has been scaling this logic beyond artificial economic boundaries.

    The real question

    The question is no longer whether the Brotherhood of Man is true.

    The question is whether we are willing to outgrow the systems that prevent it.

    Humanity will not survive by choosing sides.
    It will survive by outgrowing them.

    Not by better slogans.
    Not by louder moral appeals.

    But by aligning our systems with the reality we have always known:

    We are one human family, living inside one shared planetary system.

    Until our structures reflect that truth, brotherhood will remain a beautiful idea trapped inside a hostile design.

    And when the structures finally change, brotherhood will not need defending.

    It will simply be how the world works.

    The Brotherhood of Man can sound like an unachievable dream — and from within today’s ruthless, competitive system, that reaction is entirely understandable. We are trained to see separation as realism and cooperation as naivety.

    That sense of impossibility is precisely why I wrote Waking Up — A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity. Not to preach ideals, but to offer a different perspective — one grounded in hope, realism, and possibility.

    If we can imagine a world where human unity is structurally supported rather than morally demanded, then we can begin to create it. Every new reality starts as a thought experiment. This book is an invitation to step into that experiment — and see what becomes possible when we stop asking whether brotherhood is realistic, and start asking what kind of system would make it so.

    If this resonates, feel free to share this article.

  • Maybe There Is Still Hope…?

    Maybe There Is Still Hope…?

    It’s hard to believe in human nature these days.

    Countries invade each other. Wars rage. Civilians suffer. Ecological warnings grow louder. Artificial intelligence accelerates faster than our ethics. Even the future itself feels fragile — as if it could tip in the wrong direction at any moment.

    More and more people quietly ask the same question:

    Will humanity even survive?

    And if we do — will it be worth surviving?

    In this climate, hope can feel naïve. Trust can feel irresponsible. Believing in a positive future can seem almost delusional — like wishful thinking in the face of overwhelming evidence.

    And yet.

    Maybe there is still hope anyway.

    Not the loud optimism that pretends everything will be fine. But a quieter, more grounded hope — one that exists despite fear, not because fear is absent.

    The Fear of the Future

    We are living inside a collective anxiety about what comes next.

    Climate collapse. Political extremism. Technological power without wisdom. Economic systems that demand endless growth on a finite planet. It’s no wonder so many people feel that humanity is on borrowed time.

    From this perspective, believing that we can survive — let alone create a better world — sounds naïve.

    But maybe that’s the wrong conclusion.

    Because fear has a way of shrinking our imagination. It convinces us that what we see now is all that’s possible. That conflict is inevitable. That cooperation is fragile. That humans, when pushed, will always choose destruction over care.

    History tells a more complicated story.

    Yes, we are capable of immense harm.

    But we are also capable of extraordinary adaptation — especially when old systems break down. Maybe that is even the core feature of human nature? Adaptation? Because, if it is something humanity has done over millennia it is this, adapt.

    Naivety Is Not Weakness — It Is Strength

    But today we’re taught that trusting others in dangerous times is foolish. That skepticism equals intelligence. That cynicism is realism.

    But cynicism is easy.

    Distrust is easy.

    Closing your heart when the future feels threatening is the most understandable reaction in the world.

    What’s hard — and therefore strong — is to stay open while fully aware of the risks.

    The person who dares to trust in dire times is not ignorant.

    They are courageous.

    That kind of naivety is not blindness. It’s a conscious choice to refuse fear as a governing principle. It’s choosing connection over armor. Imagination over resignation.

    Anyone can assume the worst.

    It takes strength to believe something better is possible — and to live as if that belief matters.

    Why Literature Still Matters

    Positive literature doesn’t stop wars.

    It doesn’t dismantle failing systems overnight.

    It doesn’t save the world by itself.

    But it does something quieter — and more essential.

    It keeps the inner flame alive.

    Stories, novels, and reflections remind us who we are beneath conditioning and trauma. They stretch our sense of what’s possible. They keep the future from collapsing into inevitability.

    A single book won’t change the world.

    But books change people.

    And people — slowly, unevenly, imperfectly — change the world.

    Even cheering each other up matters. It’s not trivial. It’s resistance against despair. It’s a refusal to let fear become the final authority.

    Imagining a World That Works

    This is where the novel, Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity, begins.

    Not with the assumption that humanity is doomed — but with the question:

    What if we survive?

    And what if, after everything we’ve been through, we finally grow up as a species?

    The story follows a contemporary man who wakes up into a future where humanity has grown up and moved beyond money, war, and fear-driven systems — not because humans became perfect, but because they were forced to face the consequences of the old world and chose differently.

    It’s a work of speculative fiction — but also an act of trust.

    A trust that humans are capable of learning.

    A trust that cooperation can replace domination.

    A trust that naivety, in the deepest sense, might be our greatest strength.

    Keeping the Door Open

    Maybe hope doesn’t arrive as a solution.

    Maybe it arrives as a story that refuses to give up on us.

    Or a sentence that lands at the right moment.

    Or the quiet realization that believing in a positive future is not weakness — it’s an act of courage.

    If nothing else, literature keeps the door open.

    So that if humanity does make it through —

    the light is still on.

  • The Dawning of the Age of Aquarius

    The Dawning of the Age of Aquarius

    For centuries, humanity has sensed that history does not move in straight lines, but in long, slow waves. Cultures rise and fall, belief systems crystallize and dissolve, and every so often a deeper shift occurs — one that is felt long before it is understood.

    Astrologers have long described these great transitions as ages, each lasting more than two thousand years, shaped by the slow precession of the equinoxes. Whether one takes astrology symbolically or literally, the language of the ages has proven remarkably accurate in describing humanity’s inner development.

    From Pisces to Aquarius

    The Age of Pisces, which began around the dawn of the Christian era, was defined by faith, sacrifice, hierarchy, and authority. It was an age of belief — belief in God, belief in institutions, belief in systems that promised salvation or order if people obeyed.

    Pisces gave us compassion, art, devotion, and spiritual depth. But it also gave us rigid power structures, religious conflict, and a world organized around obedience and fear. Over time, these systems hardened. What began as guidance became control.

    The Age of Aquarius emerges as a response to this imbalance.

    Aquarius is not about belief, but about knowing. Not about religion and hierarchy, but about science and networks. Not about obedience, but participation. Its core themes are understanding, cooperation, transparency, science, technology, and — above all — humanity seen as a single interconnected whole.

    A Long Transition

    There is no single moment when the Age of Aquarius “starts.” Cultural ages overlap. Old systems do not disappear overnight; they erode while new ones quietly take root.

    Many point to early signals as far back as the Enlightenment. Others see the Industrial Revolution, the rise of electricity, global communication, civil rights movements, space exploration, and the internet as unmistakable Aquarian markers.

    In this sense, we have been entering the Age of Aquarius for generations.

    And yet, only now do its implications become unavoidable.

    The Crisis That Forces Awakening

    Every age change is turbulent. When the old worldview no longer fits reality, crises multiply. Today, humanity faces a convergence of breakdowns:

    • ecological overshoot

    • climate disruption

    • economic inequality

    • mental health collapse

    • technological power without ethical coherence

    These are not isolated problems. They are symptoms of a worldview that has reached its limits.

    Aquarius does not promise comfort. It demands maturity.

    It asks humanity to move from competition to cooperation, from ownership to stewardship, from artificial scarcity to shared abundance.

    A New Question for Humanity

    The core Aquarian question is not:

    Who is right?

    but:

    What works — for everyone and for the planet?

    This is a radical shift. It dissolves ideological battles and replaces them with systemic thinking. It reframes economics, governance, technology, and even identity itself.

    It is here that storytelling becomes essential.

    For some of us, this recognition has personal roots. I was born in 1966 and grew up with the cultural echo of the musical Hair — especially the song Aquarius. Long before I could articulate systems or futures, those words carried a simple, disarming intuition: harmony, understanding, sympathy, trust. As the song goes:

    Harmony and understanding

    Sympathy and trust abounding

    That early emotional imprint never left. It shaped a lifelong sensitivity toward humanity itself — a stubborn wish that we might see one another not as rivals or enemies, but as companions sharing the same fragile world. When stories touch that place, they don’t persuade; they remind.

    No more falsehoods or derisions

    Golden living dreams of visions

    Mystic crystal revelation

    And the mind’s true liberation, Aquarius

    Aquarius

    Why Stories Matter in Times of Transition

    Facts alone do not change civilizations. Stories do.

    Humanity learns through narrative — through imagined futures that allow us to emotionally rehearse what does not yet exist. In earlier ages, myths explained the cosmos. Today, speculative stories explore what kind of society we might become.

    This is where Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity finds its place.

    The novel does not argue. It does not preach. It simply asks:

    What if humanity grew up and outgrew money, war, and artificial scarcity — and built a world organized around cooperation, intelligence, and care for life itself?

    It presents the Age of Aquarius not as ideology, but as lived reality.

    The Age of Aquarius as a Direction, Not a Destination

    The most important misunderstanding about the Age of Aquarius is the belief that it will arrive fully formed.

    It won’t.

    It will be built — patiently, imperfectly — by people who sense that another way is possible, and who are willing to imagine it before it exists.

    Every conversation that replaces fear with understanding.

    Every system redesigned for inclusion instead of control.

    Every story that reminds us we are one human family.

    These are not side notes of history.

    They are how ages change.

    A Quiet Dawn

    The dawning of the Age of Aquarius is not announced with trumpets.

    It arrives quietly — in ideas that refuse to go away, in values that feel self-evident to new generations, in the growing discomfort with systems that no longer make sense.

    And perhaps most of all, it arrives in a simple, radical longing:

    That we might stop seeing one another as enemies — and begin, at last, to see ourselves as partners.

    ⸻

    Call to Action

    If this vision resonates with you — if you sense that humanity is standing at the threshold of a new way of living — Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity offers a story that explores that future from the inside.

    Not as fantasy. Not as doctrine.

    But as an invitation and inspiration.

    Are you one of those who sense that another way is possible?

    Are you willing to imagine it before it exists?

    If so:

    Read the book. Share the idea. Be part of the dawn.

  • The Declaration of Human Rights

    The Declaration of Human Rights

    How much is it actually lived up to?

    In 1948, in the aftermath of the Second World War, humanity made a remarkable statement.

    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed that every human being is born free and equal in dignity and rights. It affirmed rights to life, liberty, security, food, housing, healthcare, education, work, rest, and participation in society.

    After the atrocities of WW2 it was meant as a collective “never again.”

    And yet, more than seventy-five years later, a quiet question lingers beneath the surface:

    How much of this declaration is actually lived — not in words, but in reality?

    ⸻

    A moral milestone — not an operating system

    The Declaration of Human Rights is one of the most beautiful documents humanity has ever produced. It has inspired constitutions, civil rights movements, and international law. It has given language and legitimacy to struggles for dignity across the world.

    But there is an important detail we rarely confront honestly:

    The declaration is not legally binding.

    It is a moral compass, not an operating system.

    And more importantly — it was never accompanied by a redesign of the systems meant to support it.

    ⸻

    Rights on paper — conditions in reality

    On paper, every human has the right to adequate food, housing, healthcare, and security.

    In reality:

    • Millions work full time and still cannot afford to live well

    • Access to healthcare depends on income or nationality

    • Poverty itself is often punished rather than addressed

    • Refugees and migrants live in permanent legal limbo

    • Starvation can often be rampant in parts of the world

    A right that depends on purchasing power is not truly a right.

    It is limited access — granted conditionally.

    The declaration speaks in universal terms.

    The system delivers selectively.

    ⸻

    Equality before the law — in theory

    The Declaration states that all are equal before the law.

    Yet in practice:

    • Money buys better legal outcomes

    • Corporations enjoy protections individuals do not

    • Environmental destruction is rarely prosecuted proportionally

    • Indigenous land rights are overridden in the name of “development”

    Justice, like so many rights, bends quietly toward power.

    ⸻

    Freedom — with invisible boundaries

    Most people are technically free to speak, move, and express themselves.

    But:

    • Whistleblowers are punished

    • Journalists are imprisoned or killed

    • Economic pressure silences dissent

    • Algorithms amplify some voices while burying others

    Freedom exists — but often only within boundaries that remain unspoken.

    ⸻

    The right to life — selectively defended

    Nearly every nation that signed the Declaration participates in war, arms trade, or policies that knowingly harm civilians.

    • Civilian deaths become statistics.

    • Environmental collapse is treated as collateral damage.

    • Future generations have no legal standing at all.

    Human rights are defended loudly — until they conflict with power, profit, or geopolitics.

    ⸻

    The uncomfortable truth

    The Declaration of Human Rights assumes a world where systems serve humans.

    But we live in a world where humans serve systems:

    • Money precedes rights

    • Markets outrank morality

    • Survival must be earned

    • Systems are defended even when they harm people

    So the declaration floats above reality as an ideal —

    while the underlying system quietly undermines it every day.

    This is not primarily a failure of human values.

    It is a failure of design.

    ⸻

    The question the Declaration quietly leads to

    Once this contradiction is seen, an unavoidable question emerges:

    What kind of system would actually make the Declaration of Human Rights real?

    If human rights are to be lived rather than merely declared, they cannot be conditional. A right that depends on income, status, employment, or luck is not a right — it is a privilege.

    A system that fully honors human rights would therefore have to guarantee access to life’s essentials — food, water, shelter, healthcare, education, and basic security — by default, not as rewards for success in a competitive market.

    These essentials would not be commodities.

    They would be infrastructure — part of the shared foundation of society, like roads, clean air, or gravity.

    This also implies a different relationship to the planet itself. Earth was not created by anyone alive today. Its resources are a shared inheritance, not private trophies. We must declare them as what they really are: a shared inheritance. In the book Waking Up, the protagonist wakes up in a future world where humanity has already been waking up and created a new world where the human rights are actually heeded and built into the system. Stewardship replaces ownership. Access replaces accumulation.

    Contribution, then, becomes something people choose — guided by interest, ability, creativity, and care — rather than something coerced by survival pressure. Only under such conditions does “freedom of work” become real rather than theoretical.

    This is not about charity, redistribution, or ideology.

    It is about coherence and an awakened humanity.

    As long as money remains the gatekeeper of life, human rights will remain something we defend after they are violated — rather than something we design never to be violated in the first place.

    ⸻

    Where the question continues

    This line of thought does not end with theory.

    It is explored through story rather than argument in this  book:

    Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity.

    The book does not try to convince the reader of a new system.

    Instead, it invites them to step inside a world where the old rulebook has quietly dissolved — and to experience what happens to people, relationships, responsibility, and meaning when human rights stop being conditional.

    Not as a blueprint.

    Not as ideology.

    But as inspiration.

    👉 If this article resonated, the story continues in Waking Up.

    GET THE BOOK

    ⸻

  • Why Waking Up Is Not a Blueprint — And Why the Future Should Never Have One

    Why Waking Up Is Not a Blueprint — And Why the Future Should Never Have One

    From time to time, Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity is described as a “blueprint” for a new society.

    The word is meant with admiration — a recognition that the world portrayed in the story feels coherent, compelling, and deeply humane.

    But the truth is simple:

    It is not a blueprint.

    And a future worth living in should never be based on one.

    A blueprint belongs to a different era of human consciousness. —

    a time when the world believed it needed strict plans, rigid structures, and predefined systems to shape the unknown.

    In contrast, the future hinted at in Waking Up emerges from something much deeper than planning:

    a shift in how humanity sees itself.

    This article explores why the book is not a blueprint,

    why the future must remain fluid,

    and how a new consciousness is already transforming what humanity expects from its systems.

    ⸻

    Blueprints Come From an Old Consciousness

    A blueprint is a product of fear-driven thinking.

    It reflects an assumption that people need to be controlled, guided, and managed from above — that order must be imposed rather than allowed.

    Blueprints emerge from:

    • distrust of human nature

    • fear of mistakes

    • anxiety about uncertainty

    • attempts to design behavior

    • systems that see people as objects to be moved through procedures

    They belong to a mindset shaped by historical trauma:

    a world where competition, scarcity, and survival anxiety made rigid systems feel necessary.

    Much of classic dystopian fiction — 1984, Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451 — reflects this worldview.

    They depicted horrifying futures engineered by fear, where humanity was controlled through rigid structure, technology, and force.

    Those visions came from a consciousness that believed enforced control was the only alternative to chaos.

    The world of Waking Up arises from the opposite.

    ⸻

    A New Consciousness Is Already Emerging

    Humanity is beginning to experience itself differently.

    Not as isolated individuals, but as interconnected expressions of the same living whole.

    This new awareness is spreading quietly, globally, and without central leadership.

    People increasingly recognize that:

    • humanity is one species sharing one planet

    • separation is an illusion created by fear

    • collaboration is natural

    • harming another being ultimately harms oneself

    • life thrives when approached with respect

    • consciousness shapes systems, not the other way around

    This shift is not theoretical.

    It is already here.

    And it is the soil from which a new kind of world can grow —

    a world built not on fear, but on recognition.

    A world where systems arise from understanding rather than enforcement.

    ⸻

    The World of Waking Up Emerges — It Is Not Engineered

    The society depicted in the novel is not designed in advance.

    It is not the result of committees, diagrams, or bureaucratic planning.

    It is what naturally appears when humanity awakens into unity.

    Such a world emerges because:

    • fear no longer governs behaviour

    • empathy becomes instinctive

    • trust replaces suspicion

    • survival is no longer the driving force

    • technology serves life instead of profit

    • people feel responsible for each other

    • collaboration is easier than conflict

    When consciousness changes, systems reorganize themselves.

    Not through command, but through coherence.

    Not through rules, but through shared life supporting values.

    Not through rigid structures, but through naturally evolving patterns.

    A blueprint cannot produce such a world.

    Awakening can.

    ⸻

    Systems Exist — But They Are Living Systems, Not Bureaucracies

    A humane future is not system-less.

    Systems remain necessary for coordination, communication, and daily life.

    But the nature of those systems changes profoundly.

    Instead of controlling people, they support people.

    Instead of restricting action, they facilitate action.

    Instead of imposing order, they reflect organic order.

    Instead of treating individuals like cases, files, or packages to be processed,

    they treat every person as a human being — with dignity, creativity, and inherent worth.

    This shift alone dismantles half of what is traditionally called “bureaucracy.”

    Bureaucracy is what happens when systems lose sight of humanity.

    Awakened systems never forget it.

    In the old consciousness, systems protect themselves from the population.

    In the new consciousness, systems help the population express its highest potential.

    ⸻

    Why a Blueprint Would Undermine Everything

    A blueprint requires:

    • rigid definitions

    • fixed roles

    • predetermined structures

    • rules enforced from above

    • a central authority to uphold it

    • compliance from everyone

    • a future frozen on paper before it is lived

    Such rigidity recreates the very consciousness the world is growing beyond.

    A blueprint for an awakened world is a contradiction.

    It would instantly pull humanity back into:

    • hierarchy

    • control

    • dogma

    • ideology

    • conflict over interpretation

    • power struggles over “the right version”

    Blueprints create gatekeepers.

    Awakening removes the gates.

    Any attempt to “design” the awakened world would recreate the egoic mindset the story transcends.

    The future cannot be diagrammed.

    It must be discovered.

    ⸻

    The Future Will Be Co-Created, Not Pre-Designed

    The new world will not emerge from manuals, manifestos, or static visions.

    It will emerge from consciousness.

    From people who act from unity rather than fear.

    From cultures that treat life as sacred rather than expendable.

    From communities that choose cooperation over coercion.

    From technologies that amplify awareness rather than dominate behavior.

    From shared agreements that evolve as humanity evolves.

    Such a world is not built —

    it grows.

    It is not engineered —

    it unfolds.

    It is not enforced —

    it is emergent.

    And because it is alive, it can never be captured in a blueprint.

    ⸻

    Why Waking Up Must Remain a Vision, Not a Plan

    The power of the novel lies in what it reflects, not what it prescribes.

    It shows what becomes possible when humanity awakens.

    It portrays a world shaped by consciousness rather than fear.

    It invites readers to imagine life beyond survival and separation.

    Its purpose is not to explain systems, but to illuminate the state of mind that gives rise to them.

    Not to dictate, but to inspire.

    Not to design, but to remind.

    Not to construct the future, but to reveal what emerges when humanity becomes ready.

    A blueprint belongs to the past.

    Awakening belongs to the future.

    And the world that follows awakening can only be lived —

    never engineered.

    ⸻

    Call To Action

    To explore the vision behind this article, visit the world of Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity and discover a future shaped by consciousness rather than control.

    👉 Available HERE.

    ⸻

  • Too Simple, Even Naïve — And Proud of It

    Too Simple, Even Naïve — And Proud of It

    The Alchemist has sold about 150 million copies since its quiet debut in 1988.

    My book, Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity, launched on May 2, 2025, and is currently moving at a slightly more contemplative pace — around five or six copies a month.

    At this rate, I’ll catch up with Paulo Coelho somewhere around the year 47,312.

    But who’s counting?

    People have told me Waking Up is “too simple,” “too idealistic,” even “naïve.”

    And I smile, because those are the same words critics once used to describe some of the most beloved books ever written:

    • The Alchemist — “childlike allegory.”

    • The Little Prince — “too simple for adults.”

    • Jonathan Livingston Seagull — “new-age fluff.”

    • Siddhartha — “mystical oversimplification.”

    • Always Coming Home — “utopian idealism.”

    Apparently, sincerity makes people nervous.

    But maybe simplicity isn’t a flaw — maybe it’s the distillation of depth.

    When a story dares to believe in meaning, kindness, or transformation without irony, critics roll their eyes — until the world quietly falls in love with it.

    ⸻

    How the “naïve” ones sold

    If we’re keeping score, here’s how the simpletons have done:

    • The Little Prince — around 200 million copies.

    • The Alchemist — about 150 million.

    • Siddhartha — roughly 50 million.

    • Jonathan Livingston Seagull — somewhere near 40 million.

    • Always Coming Home — maybe a few hundred thousand.

    And then there’s Waking Up — proudly holding at five or six copies a month.

    Which, if you think about it, might make it the most energy-efficient book launch in history.

    (Why rush a planetary awakening, right?)

    But here’s the thing — I didn’t write Waking Up out of ambition at all.

    I wasn’t trying to become a bestselling author.

    I had never even written a full-length story before, only essays at university. Waking Up began as a screenplay, an idea for a film about a world beyond money and struggle. I had no clue if I could pull it off.

    What drove me wasn’t career — it was curiosity and hope.

    I wanted to show humanity an alternative future — a world we could actually long to live in.

    Not another dystopia to fear, but a vision to believe in.

    If Waking Up ever reaches millions of readers, it won’t be my “success” — it will be our success, because it means the story resonated deeply enough to tilt our collective imagination toward something better.

    The royalties wouldn’t fund mansions or yachts; they’d firstly help make a movie to spread the ideas even further, and then, build the first City of Light, a real-world prototype of the cooperative, money-free world described in the book.

    Buying the book helps make that future physically possible.

    Reading it helps make it emotionally possible.

    ⸻

    A lineage of clarity

    The Alchemist is a perfect example. It’s a straight road through the desert — one boy, one dream, one revelation. A parable so linear that a child can follow it, yet so archetypal that philosophers still quote it.

    Its strength lies in its clarity. The Alchemist asks,

    “What is your personal legend?”

    It became a global phenomenon because everyone, everywhere, can answer that question.

    Waking Up carries that torch into the 21st century — but widens the question:

    “What is humanity’s personal legend?”

    Where Santiago’s treasure was individual, Waking Up explores our collective treasure — a world healed of scarcity, fear, and competition. A civilization guided not by money and greed but by trust and creative abundance.

    ⸻

    Utopian? Maybe. But that’s the point.

    Of them all, Ursula Le Guin’s Always Coming Home might be the truest kin to Waking Up. Both imagine a cooperative, post-monetary humanity — not as a fantasy of escape but as a return home.

    Le Guin’s masterpiece was visionary, but also fragmented — an anthropological mosaic rather than a story. Critics admired it, but few readers finished it. It was too far ahead of its time, and too far from the emotional thread most readers need.

    I learned from that. I wanted to write a book that could touch the mainstream without dumbing down the vision.

    That’s why Waking Up is linear, cinematic, and emotionally grounded.

    It began as a screenplay — and maybe that’s why it reads like one.

    You don’t have to understand systems theory or spiritual philosophy to get it.

    You just follow Ben — and before you know it, you’ve crossed into another kind of world.

    ⸻

    The quiet revolution of sincerity

    My goal was simple: for the reader to pause somewhere in the story and think,

    “Hm. This is a world I’d like to live in.”

    That thought — quiet, almost casual — is the beginning of transformation.

    It’s the spark where imagination becomes possibility.

    Because in a culture addicted to irony, sincerity itself is rebellion.

    And the deepest revolutions have always begun with simple words that everyone can understand.

    So yes, call Waking Up naïve if you like.

    I’ll take that as a compliment.

    After all, The Alchemist had to start somewhere too.

    And maybe, just maybe, Waking Up is where we start — again.

    ⸻

    🌅 Ready to wake up?

    Read Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity:

    order
  • What if Everyone Awakened Tomorrow…?

    What if Everyone Awakened Tomorrow…?

    This isn’t just a spiritual fantasy; it’s a thought experiment that could reshape our understanding of humanity’s potential. What would happen if, overnight, 8 billion people saw through the illusions of materialism and power? Let’s explore this hypothetical scenario, diving into the immediate chaos, the transformation of society, and the long-term possibilities for a world reborn.

    ⸻

    🌪️ Day One: The Chaos

    Picture the scene: it’s October 27, 2025, and at precisely 8:00 AM, a wave of clarity sweeps the globe. Every person, from a farmer in rural India to a CEO in Manhattan, grasps the truth of existence—connection over competition, love over fear. The first hours are chaotic, but not in a destructive way. 

    The world hits pause.

    Workplaces grind to a halt. Politicians mid-speech freeze, drop their scripts, and declare “I’m sorry.”

    Stock markets collapse not from fear — but because no one cares about profit anymore.

    Pilots land their planes, hug their passengers, and walk into the sunset to meditate.

    X melts into a global therapy circle. Billionaires start live-streaming apologies.

    Elon Musk tweets: “Turns out rockets were just a distraction from inner peace. Selling everything for a commune on Mars — BYO enlightenment.”

    Armies lay down weapons. Dictators call for forgiveness summits.

    Banks and governments start erasing all debt.

    The Vatican live-streams “We meant well.”

    And somewhere, Jeff Bezos stares at a warehouse and whispers:

    “Why do I own all this stuff when others have nothing?”

    Moments later, he donates it all.

    Chaos? Yes.

    But it’s a sacred kind — the confusion of humanity waking from a collective nightmare.

    ⸻

    ☀️ Day Two: The Calm

    Then, silence.

    A great, planetary exhale.

    The systems built on fear and scarcity simply… stop.

    There’s no revolution, no coup — just a quiet realization that competition no longer makes sense.

    Former leaders become stewards of the Earth, and take all people with them. Corporations turn into Communities.

    Money dissolves, not through decree but through irrelevance.

    The same data that once optimized profit now coordinates abundance.

    AI becomes a caretaker of harmony — helping match every resource to every need.

    No hunger. No hoarding. No ownership — only usership and stewardship, guided by compassion and common sense.

    Cities evolve into Cities of Light, radiant ecosystems where architecture follows nature, art, and joy.

    Education becomes exploration.

    Governments transform into councils of wisdom.

    Borders fade, for who can fence the sky?

    Humanity steps into what it always was meant to be: a living, creative organism of love.

    ⸻

    🌍 The Reunion of the Human Tribe

    And as the light of awareness stabilizes, something beautiful happens.

    We stop identifying as nations, classes, or ideologies.

    We remember that we’re a single tribe on a small, luminous sphere — spinning together through infinite space.

    War becomes unimaginable.

    Healing becomes the new free economy.

    Art becomes the language of diplomacy.

    The world no longer needs saving. It simply needs remembering.

    ⸻

    ✨ From Fiction to Possibility

    This is the world imagined in Waking Up — A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity:

    a world where awakening spreads not by force, but by resonance.

    A world where humanity finally grows up, smiles at its own madness, and chooses love.

    Maybe it didn’t happen overnight.

    But every thought, every act of kindness, every page you turn toward awakening… brings it closer.

    ⸻

    🌅 Call to Action

    Dive deeper into the vision of a world beyond money, fear, and separation.

    Read Waking Up — A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity today and join the movement of dreamers who dare to imagine the next step in human evolution.

    👉 Get the book here

  • The World Is Waking Up — Are You…?

    The World Is Waking Up — Are You…?

    Our “Only for the Brave” campaign just ended — and it outperformed expectations by more than 102%! It was a so-called Blaze campaign where WordPress share a post to many more potential readers than I have on my blog.

    This  meant thousands of new readers across the world have now seen the call to challenge their beliefs — and many have joined the journey.

    For me, this milestone isn’t just about clicks or stats. It’s about connection.

    Every person who paused to look, to feel something, to wonder if a better world is possible — that’s one more spark of awareness lighting up the collective mind.

    If you didn’t get the ebook during the super-low promotion, don’t worry — it’s still just $4.99 on all ebook platforms. That’s less than a cappuccino for a story that invites you to imagine what life could look like beyond money, fear, and limitation.

    ✨ Waking Up isn’t just a fantasy. It’s a reflection of what humanity could become when trust replaces trade, and creativity flows freely again.

    order now

    The world is waking up.

    One reader — one brave soul — at a time.

  • Humanity Is Waking Up – But What Does That Really Mean?

    Humanity Is Waking Up – But What Does That Really Mean?

    When I say “humanity is waking up”, it’s not just a hopeful slogan. It’s an observation, and perhaps even a prophecy. But waking up to what? And in what way?

    At first glance, it might not look like humanity is waking up at all. The news screams of wars, corruption, inequality, and ecological collapse. We seem to be racing faster and faster toward the abyss. And yet, beneath the noise, something else is stirring.

    Waking Up to the Fragility of Earth

    We are beginning to acknowledge that our planet is not an endless resource but a delicate web of life. Fires, floods, extinctions, and climate chaos force us to recognize that humanity is part of this web, not separate from it. In response, more people embrace renewable energy, regenerative farming, and circular economies. It’s slow, uneven, but real.

    Waking Up from the Illusion of Scarcity

    Money has long dictated who eats and who starves, who thrives and who suffers. But a growing awareness tells us that money itself is an invention—an artificial system of scarcity. The real wealth of the world is abundant: food, energy, creativity, love. Movements for sharing economies, cooperatives, and even resource-based visions show that alternatives are possible.

    Waking Up to Our Shared Humanity

    Borders, races, religions, and ideologies divide us only on the surface. More people are realizing that beneath those layers we are one family. The rise of movements for global justice, equality, and indigenous wisdom signals this deeper recognition, even as old systems of control cling tightly to their power.

    Waking Up Spiritually

    Most importantly, humanity is waking up to something deeper than politics or economics. We are beginning to remember who we really are: not isolated egos, but expressions of one consciousness. This awakening shows itself in the longing for connection, the spread of meditation and inner practices, the search for meaning beyond possessions.

    Spiritually, this awakening means:

    • Realizing that love and compassion are not luxuries, but the very fabric of life.
    • Seeing that the ego’s chase for power or security cannot bring peace.
    • Trusting a deeper intelligence—whether we call it God, Source, Spirit, or simply Life—that guides us when we listen.
    • Recognizing that our thoughts and choices shape reality, and that we are co-creators of the world to come.

    The Tension of Our Time

    To say “humanity is waking up” does not mean everyone suddenly becomes enlightened. It means more and more people are questioning the illusions, breaking free of fear, and daring to live differently. But as this happens, the old system pushes back. That’s why our time feels so turbulent—both abyss and awakening accelerate together.

    This is not failure. It is birth.

    A Call to Each of Us

    If humanity is waking up, it’s not an abstract idea—it’s a personal invitation. Each of us is part of this shift. We can choose to close our eyes, or to see clearly. To cling to separation, or to live in connection. To act from fear, or from love.

    The real question is not “Is humanity waking up?” but “Am I waking up—and how will I live that awakening?”

    A Mirror in Story

    This is also the journey at the heart of my novel Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity. In the book, Benjamin Michaels awakens in a future awakened society that has left money and fear behind, learning step by step what it means to live in connection, compassion, and trust. His shock, his doubts, and his eventual transformation mirror the path we are all walking now.

    Reading his story is not just entertainment—it’s a glimpse into what our collective awakening could look like, if we dare to imagine it and live it together.

    👉 Get the book here and be part of the story of humanity’s awakening.

  • Sameness vs. Oneness – A Deeper Kind of Unity

    Sameness vs. Oneness – A Deeper Kind of Unity

    (This article continues the reflections from my previous piece on “Sameness” and dives deeper into what true unity might mean.)

    In The Giver, society enforces peace by removing differences. Emotions are dulled, individuality is erased, and sameness becomes the guiding principle. No differences, no conflict. But also—no freedom, no creativity, no love in its true form. It is unity through control.

    The question is: is that the only way to achieve peace? Must harmony come at the price of conformity?

    In Waking Up, the vision is the opposite. Here, peace comes not from control but from trust—trust in human beings, trust in life itself. At first glance, that might sound dangerous. Won’t total freedom lead to chaos? But it doesn’t, because the foundation is not outer sameness, but inner Oneness.

    If we define ourselves as small, separate selves, then differences appear threatening. But if we expand our definition of Self to include everyone—to realize that we are all expressions of the same spirit—then harming another is as unthinkable as your right hand stabbing your left. Outer diversity becomes beautiful, not dangerous, because underneath it we are the same life, the same consciousness.

    So there are two kinds of unity:

    • Sameness through control (The Giver): “Let’s remove differences so we won’t clash.”
    • Oneness through spirit (Waking Up): “Let’s embrace differences, knowing we are already One at the core.”

    One narrows the self until nothing sticks out. The other expands the self until everyone is included.

    And that is the key: true peace doesn’t come from making people the same—it comes from remembering that, at the deepest level, we already are.

    ✨ If this vision resonates with you, dive deeper into Waking Up – A Journey Towards a New Dawn for Humanity. Order your copy here:

    ORDER BOOK

    Featured image designed by Freepik